Since Dale Sr is VERY familiar with the Powell case...let us use that as a reference point. How many times were Josh's boys interviewed by how many professionals BEFORE they finally started to piece together what had taken place? How long did that process take? IMO Dale Jr and Sr are quite familiar with that case and afraid the twinners may recall what happened eventually even if they saw just one piece of the puzzle. Out of that fear, Jr is keeping the twinners from their loving, responsible grandparents BP, GP, and YS. All JMO
Jazz, I only stated the facts about reports of the twins being interviewed by the police and IMO one would have to be at a loss to imagine what the twins would have had further to say after having been interviewed at least once by LE ... 3 years old do not have complex minds, if they had witnessed something significant they would have had related it to the police during the interview ... I mean Mom and Dad fighting or an act of violence between them is not something they simply might have not recollected then but would recollect now, and in any case, if the police needed to interview the twins further IMO they may obtain a court order assuming such a request would be denied but Dale and that would be even notwithstanding that as a matter of fact there are no suggestions by anyone directly involved in this case, that the police had request such additional interviews much less that they had been denied the opportunity. And I do understand everyone is entitled to their own opinions but someone else is also entitled to mention the facts, where possibly relevant, and to wonder what those opinions are based on so as to try to put what is being said in a given context.
Lastly much has been said and continues to be said about the unfortunate situation that is the visitation issue, which most of us here are well aware of and IMO it seems clear how it becomes extremely difficult
for all parties involved to work out visitation schedules of this nature where the parties become antagonists to each other, and not a matter or simply being spiteful or trying to hide some alleged evidence no one's heard of and that has being conjured up in someone's mind just because
everything is possible after all. IMO there is no one who's been involved in matters of visitation that does not understand the absolute need to maintain a level of cooperation between the parties that
cannot possibly include outright accusations of wrong doing
by one side or both. Universally, visitation agreements come with a
written stipulation that one party cannot disparage the other IMO and that is not even to speak about outright accusations of murder in a public setting. It seems extremely problematic for any parent to thrust one's own children in these kind of situations and as I expressed in other posts there's a need here for
all parties involved to take a step backward and try to sort out the issues in a more productive way and where the interests of the children are the real concerns and not personal feelings, whether justified or not and to take this visitations problem from the public sphere, where every John, Dick and Harry can have their go at it, and into a
private family setting where such issues have a far greater chance to be resolved assuming a
compromising, non-accusatory and non-confrontational approach to the issues
on all sides of the dispute. JMO
