Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The one single fact that has bothered me for a long time now here is the role of the police. Yes I know that as far as investigations are concerned, it's often the case that details of an active investigation are best kept out of the public sphere for obvious reasons .. fair enough, however in this case it has always struck me as quite odd that the police have never released one single solitary piece of evidence that directly implicates anyone in this case. Surely there's a group of people here and I guess elsewhere who believe that DS did it, and for what I know that might very well happen to be correct, but none of it amounts to anything of significance one way or the other without concrete evidence from which to build a case and to achieve the most important outcome here which is to find Michelle.
Now, my question would be how long is long enough until continuing on doing the same thing or possibly doing nothing of further significance is a reasonable position from which to expect a different result? Somebody most likely saw something, somebody possibly has seen something of significance but it's not consciously able to put together the proverbial 2 + 2 ... and yet nothing is known publicly outside of the broad outline of Michelle disappearance, nothing is known outside the million and one ways DS might/should/could have done it minus all the evidence necessary to prove it ... and after 2 years we haven't taken one measurable, concrete, definable step further along then we were at the beginning.
Thus, to pick up on my original point, this whole thing to me begs on fundamental question: how long (if ever) the police should release the "evidence" they have (if any)? When are they going to answer the question of what they have done, are doing or plan to do? Assuming this case doesn't break, is it after 3 years? Four? Five? Ten? At what point are they going to try to enlist the help of potential eyewitness by releasing possibly consequential information? Or are we going to be satisfied to occasionally lament Michelle not having been found or to simply make broad statements of guilt by a specific party and beliefs of sure resolutions notwithstanding one single solitary direct evidence to that effect?