So you think she used an old photo on purpose? To mislead? I don't get it.
Do you think its possible?
So you think she used an old photo on purpose? To mislead? I don't get it.
http://www.news4jax.com/video/21344324/index.html
She looks like she's wearing black sweat pants. Definitely not medical office attire.
Therefore, I'm of the opinion that she changed clothes.
Here's what I wonder, though - did she change clothes at the behest of LE?
To protect their privacy and publicity rights, would be my guess. Among other things, his function would be to negotiate contracts involving the commercial use of Somer's name and image.? watch out for the family, why?
Why would she do that?
but....according to DT, Somer had NEVER.EVER run off....or did I hear that wrong?
And that's one part of the whole going home for lunch that has never made sense! Chee posted many threads ago that DT worked @ the Jax office, because she said DT is the one who scheduled her appointment for her.
What would she gain by useing an old photo to mislead?
And that's one part of the whole going home for lunch that has never made sense! Chee posted many threads ago that DT worked @ the Jax office, because she said DT is the one who scheduled her appointment for her.
But, I remember seeing her standing there at the presser with a picture of Somer begging for info and please help find Somer. How is that wrong?
IMO what she had on and what she said then has been picked apart. My point is the more media coverage the better right????? Isn't that how it normally works. The family of victims want to keep their childs face in the public spotlight. I feel that's what she was doing.
After Somer was found, she shifted her focus on justice IMO. I think it's still important to keep the case in the spotlight until it has been solved.
Do you think it's possible DT is just trying to prevent this case from being forgotten? Like so many other cases have been.
Have you ever known a narcissistic person?
They think they are smart and can fool people with there acting skills.
I am not sure of the day...but it is the first presser that she did with the Sheriff.....I am thinking maybe wed morning before her body was found?? not sure of the day...No, but it was my belief that she meant no, she'd never run off and been gone hours and hours and hours.
I can't recall when the first time she says that is. She appeared with the Sheriff ... was that Tuesday?
And that's one part of the whole going home for lunch that has never made sense! Chee posted many threads ago that DT worked @ the Jax office, because she said DT is the one who scheduled her appointment for her.
I'm sorry. I'm trying to understand. I still just don't quite get how the old photo would benefit DT even if she was the one who out and out killed Somer. If she did it or knew who did do it, then she would have known she was already "disposed of". What harm would a recent photo do?
I'm just not getting it.
I think it is a misperception by the public. Just because we are not privy to updates by LE or media appearances by DT, in no way indicates that the case has lost any significance to the people that matter most. The investigators. They do not require media spotlight on this to solve. If they did, they would be the ones out there in it.
Would LE ask the parent of a missing child to remove their clothes?
I know they were treating it as a missing child case initially but 7 hours after Somer not coming home ...
I remember reading somewhere that she left work at 4:20.....don't even ask me where...LOL
I think it is a misperception by the public. Just because we are not privy to updates by LE or media appearances by DT, in no way indicates that the case has lost any significance to the people that matter most. The investigators. They do not require media spotlight on this to solve. If they did, they would be the ones out there in it.