vlpate
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2009
- Messages
- 7,113
- Reaction score
- 2,935
I wonder the same things- the guy who my husband busted said he got them on the Internet no personal kids that he knew. I'm so very careful of pictures I post of my son just because of creeps like this. I will not post pictures of him in the tub or anything like that. Some parents post pictures and not think about the dangers. I think it's so disturbing all together makes me cringe! Just think what kind of person Brunn was! It's just sick that's all there is to it just sick and I'm so sorry what happened to this child. If only he would have killed himself before!
Yes, most of the child *advertiser censored* found on computers come from the Internet. Pictures of kids in a bathtub, or in their underwear, or even naked, are not considered child *advertiser censored* - the pictures have to be of a sexual nature....so those 700 pictures would have to be more than just pictures he swiped off someone's facebook page. I totally agree with you - if my daughter were still young, I would never have put her pics on facebook for public viewing. Too scary - especially when you are a member here!
Back to topic - was it ever determined who the pictures were of that were on RB's friends computer?