they would know, could know, but too many riddles, not enough or wrong info has been given all along in this case via media by whomever is feeding the media, so I'm not believing half of what I see or hear anymore. My question is: How can you know who DIDN'T do it, per one recent article, about all the tips they've gotten, and still not know WHO did it. Have they investigated all those tips or are they considered coo coo and brush them off, as that's how one article sounded?
Also, fell asleep the other night reading the latest novel of SS, didnt' finish, pictured with his spectacles and badass look with cigar, Seems he's become a movie star overnight since the D's murder. It was a GREAT ARTICLE DONT' GET ME WRONG, BUT I was kind of appalled. Next thing they'll be making a movie about SS.
I see narcissism in this whole article about HIM, yes the media wrote it but he let them and posed for that picture. Why has it taken this long to give a little bit more info to the public on the D's case, weve been fed morsels for a year. At first it was just personal to the dermonds per SS, lastly this guy is capable of anything and he's still on the loose per SS. SO is the murderer a serial killer or not? Is he from round here or aint he, is he from NJ or not? He's just talking to be talking, whatever comes out of his mouth people seem to want to worship and it's all been so contradictory or vague
How is SS any better than other Sheriffs or investigators who are NOT from a small town who likely have solved more than this man? but it hasn't been reported, all because maybe their case wasn't a beheading or their percentages were lower, only becuase they would likely have way more cases than SS has ever had.
I think he's enjoying the fame and is a little too narcissistic to ask for help from some guys who had bumped heads with him before.
I liked the article for the tidbits we were fed again, and the story, but not for his fame becuase a couple was brutally murdered and he hasn't solved it
????????????