RANCH
United we stand, divided we fall.
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2008
- Messages
- 18,283
- Reaction score
- 39,121
I'm with you. Motive might not be necessary in a court of law but it would sure go a long way in the court of Snoopy, in large part because my heart/head do not want to wrap around the idea that a parent would willingly put their child through such a horrendous, tortuous death. I want more proof before I land squarely on the "oh he's so guilty of planning the death of his child" side of the fence because it is such a foreign concept to me. Even though I now it happens, my brain just wants to reject the idea.
I think that it's possible, but not certain, we will see some more evidence that JRH is guilty as charged. A clear motive will certainly bolster any of that evidence.
A lack of a clear motive could diminish the value of that evidence and leave room for reasonable doubt.
JMO.