Native New Yorker
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2008
- Messages
- 501
- Reaction score
- 1
Live feed:
http://www.livestream.com/wctveyewitnessnews
http://www.livestream.com/wctveyewitnessnews
I also do not understand how Suber conducts herself.....just saying " not relevant" instead of saying " I object"
And what is up with everyone addressing him as Judge, instead of your Honor?
This may answer some questions..
http://www.caught.net/prose/advtt/hbdemons.htm
Since the days of "show & tell", demonstrative evidence has been a very important teaching tool. Learning through seeing and hearing things is much easier and more fun. Most jury psychologists, including Amy Singer, believe that people learn much more through seeing and hearing rather than from hearing alone. Accordingly, demonstrative evidence should be used at trial to give the jury a better understanding of your case. The use of demonstrative evidence usually grabs the jury's attention and often has them sitting at the edge of their seats when things like models and objects are being shown
When Suber objects to evidence based upon relevance she is trying to discredit the item's value or worth.
Did anybody catch the name/type exact ID of the bayonet?
Also, if anybody can direct me to a site that I can match handle markings (the end of the handle) of bayonets to those found on the deceased (in another case) I would be ever so grateful.
Most of the knife and bayonet sites do not show pictures of the very end of the handle but they show them from the side. I am looking for a specific mark I have found that may have been cause by a perpetrator striking a victim with the end of the handle.
Thanks in advance if anybody can help, truly.
Thanks everybody for all of the updates, as well.
Sorry, my post WAS confusing...I certainly know what objections are, and also know they are either sustained or overruled.
My point was her RUDE failure to observe proper protocol, by not saying the words, " I object".
Suber just kept muttering " not relevant".[/b]