George and Krystal Holloway/River Cruz *MERGED*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
BBM-but he does not say WHOM it was explained to him BY. This can STILL not be attributed to someone else said this and NOT River/Krystal. Who is LANCE?:waitasec:

Exactly! I put this up to show how we heard about it. But it certainly doesn't tell us who originally said it.

And there's something else that keeps nagging me. At the breaking of all this "news" the only photos we could find linked to their "new" names had been uploaded to the internet only days earlier. This makes me think these folks had a plan. Don't know why, don't know for how long before, but it was certainly planned. I think the photo bit indicates that they were preparing for the public release of the information. For me, that does not score in their favor.
 
I found it interesting in the NE article that detectives seemed to be making inquiries about what George did with the money raised for Caylee.

Yes, it goes more clearly towards whether the A's knew Caylee was alive or dead, more so than hearsay. We already know that KC did nothing to help and used her $200K+ towards her Defense, so if the A's were not using the money for the search and DC was secretly searching for a dead Caylee while the A's were hyping the sighting ... it goes against the A's but also hurts KC IMO.

I think LE are seeking to eliminate the SODDI defense and determine there was knowledge that Caylee was dead from KC so it makes the trial more cut-and-dried, a done deal.
 
See...that is one of the many problems had with RC/CH story. Through the video and transcripts I have seen of LE in action, I have a VERY HARD time believing that LE would share this info (if it were true) with this woman!

I don't recall seeing or hearing the reports you are referring to by KB (but that certainly doesn't mean they didn't happen...I am not that up to date!) but also causes me to speculate that just like you, RC/KH may have seen and recalled these reports and is now interjecting that into her "story".

It has been my position all along that she has integrated details that were already out in the public into her "story" to try to give it credence. :banghead:

When I saw or read (video report of newspaper article) that there were more than one woman that George received money from, I was waiting to hear about the other women.

According to RC/CH the investigators came to her. We know that she was interviewed for more than 10 hours and that JA escorted her out the back door when the media were badgering her at the front desk when she was retrieving her cell phone.

If she was telling the truth, and LE came to her, then there's some sort of investigation going on. I keep thinking of DC and wonder if he gave LE some sort of information that led to RC/CH?

If she wasn't telling the truth, and it was RC that went to LE with this story, then I can't give it much credibility unless there's some sort of other confirmation. I guess it's one of those things that time will tell.

I agree with you that what RC/CH alleges that George told her is something that has been out there, and it's not something new and unique.
 
"h3ll hath no fury like a woman scorned"...........
how many women may come forward that george took money from................
there may be more LE talked to that we do not know of yet!
Waiting IMpatiently! LOL......
 
I don't have any problem believing LE shared that info with her. First off they showed her a text of George's to let her know the jig was up and then they told her George was taking money from other women just to upset her in case she was still in love with the guy and make it more likely she would talk.

That makes a lot of sense. A woman who learns she's just one of many and not the one and only, is going to be a bit upset.
 
quick thanks for really elevating the conversation on this topic. I have taken a lot of heat over this thread and think it is going pretty well.
Thanks again.
 
That makes a lot of sense. A woman who learns she's just one of many and not the one and only, is going to be a bit upset.
bbm
AND, talkative! Hope we get the scoop soon.
 
Per WFTV 10 pm news. This is not on their website yet.

Morgan and Morgan has released their witness list and RC is on the list.

Check www.wftv.com later.

ETA: Along with Skye, GA, CA, KC, JB, Amy and Jesse

More then 150 people on it.
 
Per WFTV 10 pm news. This is not on their website yet.

Morgan and Morgan has released their witness list and RC is on the list.

Check www.wftv.com later.

Excellent news! Morgan will get us the truth! heh heh
 
Have we seen these scandalous nekked pictures we were assured existed and were going to be released to the press last week yet? Did I miss them and/or the romantic texts?

I believe in this case we have a perp going around stealing shoes. We were waiting for the other shoe to drop and .... it is MIA. :waitasec:
 
So she is a potential witness in the defamation (civil) case of ZG too? What statements has she made that are relevant in that case? I thought the whole point of RC speculation was based on her claim that GA stated Caylee's death was an accident that "snowballed"?

There was the other tidbit that claims GA used RC as the model to describe Zanny......
 
So she is a potential witness in the defamation (civil) case of ZG too? What statements has she made that are relevant in that case? I thought the whole point of RC speculation was based on her claim that GA stated Caylee's death was an accident that "snowballed"?


Didn't someone say George modeled Zannies description after RC?
 
I believe in this case we have a perp going around stealing shoes. We were waiting for the other shoe to drop and .... it is MIA. :waitasec:

round up the posse!!!! stop that shoe swiping thief!!!!
 
Have we seen these scandalous nekked pictures we were assured existed and were going to be released to the press last week yet? Did I miss them and/or the romantic texts?

My memory is fuzzy. Who said there were naked pics? I recall there were to be intimate pics (whatever that means, and obviously not forthcoming so far).:waitasec:
 
The other huge suspicion I have is based on the fact that the alleged mistress's sister is (so far) the proponent of witnessing the alleged affair. She claims she saw them "intimately" together; she sequestered herself in her room when George came over; she is putting herself forward in claiming personal knowledge of their intimacy. But how does all this compare to her documented dates of her incarceration? Do they totally discount eliminate her assertions or is there enough wiggle room that she could have really witnessed these things? Anyone have the dates to compare at their fingertips?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
66
Guests online
2,310
Total visitors
2,376

Forum statistics

Threads
603,730
Messages
18,162,026
Members
231,839
Latest member
Backhand
Back
Top