Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Children can buy cigars?
This has always bothered me...
If the kid was waiting for Trayvon to return from the store with skittles...
Wouldn't he be concerned that he never showed up...
Why did they wait until the following morning to report him missing?
not buying the candy story...
OMG. His 'I had a dream' line just cancelled out the stupid knock-knock joke. IMO
The autopsy report said .10 cents. I don't know where the $40 came from.
Whoever thru the first punch started it. The evidence suggests to me that it was TM who did that. MOO.
Di Maio said that he had examined the autopsy, toxicology and photographic evidence and concluded that the evidence was consistent with Zimmermans statements to authorities that Martin was straddling him and that Zimmerman fired his gun with his right hand. The path of the bullet ran from Martins left side through part of his heart and into a portion of the right lung, Di Maio testified.
The medical evidence ... is consistent with his statement, Di Maio said of Zimmermans version of events.
Di Maio also testified that the hole in Martins shirt showed that the muzzle of Zimmermans gun was touching the clothing, and that the wound on Martins chest showed that his skin was two to four inches from the muzzle.
Di Maio said he based his conclusions on analysis of debris from the gunshot, including what he called powder tattoo marks surrounding the wound, which give the appearance of a reddish, circular rash on the skin. Such marks, he said, would not be present if the muzzle had been held against Martins skin.
So the muzzle of the gun was against the clothing. But the clothing itself had to be two to four inches away from the body at the time Mr. Martin was shot, he said.
This is consistent with Mr. Zimmermans account that Mr. Martin was over him, leaning forward at the time he was shot, Di Maio said.
TM was getting up which allowed GZ to pull the gun. If TM has a full mount GZ cannot access the gun.
If the defense shows illustration that depicts TM swinging on GZ. The state should be able to show how the gun would be positioned where the muzzle is touching the clothes but not the skin and how the bullet would enter the left side traveling to the right.
If you don't believe it have someone mount you with a MMA full mount and try to touch your hip. The only way is if they stood up.
You raise a good point, I had missed. I agree with you any young guy awaiting his skittles is going to wonder what happened. I'm surprised that no one reported him missing until the next morning. Maybe he was going to a friends' house....idk IMO
This has always bothered me...
If the kid was waiting for Trayvon to return from the store with skittles...
Wouldn't he be concerned that he never showed up...
Why did they wait until the following morning to report him missing?
not buying the candy story...
No. The sales clerk refused to sell it to him. JMO. OMO. MOO.
I agree, but also, the test is not whether Trayvon did that but whether there is a reasonable doubt that George did that. And that's without even getting to the part of the law where even an aggressor can use deadly force in certain circumstances. jmo
Children can buy cigars?
Yeah, but you have to admit that "I just killed him" draws out more emotional response from the jury than the truth.... IMO
But you're comparing apples to oranges.Shooting someone in the chest is illegal in most instances as well....
IMO
I judge in a way that is consistent with what life has shown me. imo
What's worse is he did it to try and cover up for just (virtually because he stopped himself ) calling the jury stupid. "We color coded it for ya in case . . ." and then he holds up a timeline that looks like a grade schooler made it. :facepalm:Did he just pull an Alyce Laviolette with the old don't know much about computers stuff?