So did Bittrolff have a previous criminal history when he was charged and later convicted of those 2 murders? Probably, otherwise, how did they have his DNA on file to match it to the DNA found on the 2 victims, right? Anyone know what his previous convictions, if any, were for? He claims his DNA was on those women bc he had sex with them before they died. How long does DNA stay detectable for on a body? I mean, would he have had to have sex with them the day they died, or could it be from some time earlier than that? Wasn't he able to provide exculpatory evidence like proof that he'd been on a "date" with them? I know there probably aren't actual receipts for an escort date transaction, but seems like there might be something.
Also, was his DNA the only DNA found on those two bodies? Seems like if their regular work was sex work, that they would have found DNA of others on them as well as Bittrolff's. Maybe they did, but none matched any in the database. Except Bittrolff's.
I know the 2 women he was convicted of killing were posed and/or disposed in particular ways very similar to at least one of the women who RH now is charged with killing. How similar, I wonder? Maybe too similar for most to find it a coincidence? So I assume JB is talking to lawyers about reopening his case or challenging his conviction, etc.
Alternatively, could this new charge on RH that matches some details of the victims of Bittrolff, end up actually being a 3rd vic of JB, and not a vic of RH? I know they found hair related to RH, which is why RH is charged with that one, but could the hair be from prior contact between RH and the victim, a contact that did not end up in death that time? We know RH did sometimes "date" or hire women who did survive their encounter with him.
Just some thoughts on this, spurred on by the possibility of future need to overturn convictions on JB, who then would turn out to be a wrongly convicted and imprisoned man. Without knowing more details on those similarities among victims though, I expect it will just be attributable to coincidence, meaning no judicial or legal mistakes were made re JB. But will be huge if turns out different!