Madeleine74
Knower of Things
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2011
- Messages
- 11,556
- Reaction score
- 20,084
But but but.... news articles (which have been referenced multiple times before) stated cadaver dogs did not have a single hit.
It's more likely that police found something that belonged to Heather, that was found in the M's home. Further, the DNA evidence found in the black truck is also considered "M's property." We know for sure they found something in that truck because they said they did and they made a reference to DNA. They did not say what they found, however.
Why would the mind go to the most remote and far-fetched thing. Horses vs. Zebras. Burning HE's body in the back yard? Without their children finding out? Without some kind of foul odor detected? Without a cadaver dog hitting somewhere? That's a fantasy, IMO.
I find it more probable that a cadaver dog may have hit on the truck and that's how LE 'knows' that HE is likely deceased. They wouldn't necessarily put that out in the public, but they have information that gives them some amount of confidence.
It's more likely that police found something that belonged to Heather, that was found in the M's home. Further, the DNA evidence found in the black truck is also considered "M's property." We know for sure they found something in that truck because they said they did and they made a reference to DNA. They did not say what they found, however.
Why would the mind go to the most remote and far-fetched thing. Horses vs. Zebras. Burning HE's body in the back yard? Without their children finding out? Without some kind of foul odor detected? Without a cadaver dog hitting somewhere? That's a fantasy, IMO.
I find it more probable that a cadaver dog may have hit on the truck and that's how LE 'knows' that HE is likely deceased. They wouldn't necessarily put that out in the public, but they have information that gives them some amount of confidence.