But, Dan backed out of his deal the day before. So who could benefit? Is there another case pending?
I don't think Dan DIRECTLY had anything to do with the disappearance, but I believe his affiliations and criminal background had EVERYTHING to do with it!
He changed his plea THE DAY BEFORE the girl's went missing, which will result in a trial, thus implicating other people.
The "other people", as well as Dan have already benefited...the trial has been delayed twice.
In my opinion, Dan was "the middle man" in a much broader drug/criminal ring that involved many "players" and "other people" in higher levels of a drug ring. These "other people" would be able to pull off a successful abduction/disappearance and cover their tracks, elude LE/FBI, and silence witnesses or other "players" through intimidation, fear, and/or money.
http://www.kcrg.com/news/local/Fath...-in-Court-Friday-163986616.html?m=y&smobile=y
Quote: "Cook said Morrissey had been expected to accept a plea agreement July 12, the day before the girls vanished, but decided not to do so because he was not ready to go jail. She said prosecutors had shaved his sentence from more than 45 years to 30 years and then to 10 years, with a mandatory five years behind bars, because of his cooperation." 45 years to 5 years??? HMMM
I am sure Dan's talking and identifying some "other people" and "players".