LadyPirate
New Member
I personally think they should go house to house on those particular streets and see what they find......JMO
I agree, I'd be running naked through the streets tossing out flyers if I thought that would help out. Anything to get the attention focused on finding my child. And if anyone had anything bad to say about my family, they could take a flying leap. Let them worry about my family AFTER my child was found.
But it must be hard for Gma to ignore gossip and innuendo given the somewhat unusual family dynamics (drugs, restraining orders, overdoses, trials). She has to know that some people are perceiving her family in negative way.
Im sick of this ****!! Why is it okay to drag the parents thru the dirt, but?
I'm going to get picky again... here it comes... <lol> I read that as an absolute minimum of 8 minutes (12:23 - 12:30), which is doable, yes. Especially to Gilbert/Elmer/Etc. And as long as 38 minutes <sigh>
By another timeline, however... hm...
Im sick of this ****!! Why is it okay to drag the parents thru the dirt, but?
Well you know what, if it was my girls that were gone, I wouldn't give a flying fig what people were saying about me.
I would only have room for one concern.
Gossip and innuendo would not even register on my radar.
Where did the 12:27 cell phone call get made from?
I'm going to get even pickier.
12:23 - 12:30 is 7 minutes.
The statement says approximately 12:23.
We know the date stamp on the cctv says 12:11, adding eight minutes is 12:19.
LE knows the infamous 8 minutes is out there in public knowledge. At one time they were reporting 12:15. Adding eight minutes to 12:15 is 12:23.
I don't believe that the approximate 12:23 is accurate anymore than the 12:15 was. They are close enough to say "approximately" though.
Mr. C's sighting was the huge 12-3 at one time. Now we are hearing 12:30 - 1.
I think this is the part of the ever shifting timeline. I think LE knows the real times. But move it and see who moves.
Where did the 12:27 cell phone call get made from?
IIRC it was from the parking lot of Casey's, but not the one MCM worked at.
Is that a trick question.....
a....
the cell phone..:waitasec:.
<snipped for space and BBM>
We are just finding out now, two months later, that LE knew this was not L's and E's bikes.
IMO, it is LE's duty to report what they know, if it can assist with solving this case.
But JMOO.
Oh :doh: they want to know "where" I thought it was in the bathroom at the Lake...
:waitasec:
It does, indeed, appear that way. I still don't believe those two girls were ever on that part of the bike trail in the SE corner of Meyers Lake, I still think those bikes may have been staged. This is, of course, just my opinion.
Could the park, then, have been part of a lure to get the girls down there? The very first part of the parking lot when you first enter via Elmer Ave. is a bit secluded. Is that small building just to the west, between the north parking lot and Exchange park (where the playground is) a public restroom? For anyone at the lake that day, closer to the dock area and the larger section of parking lot, that area could appear isolated, couldn't it? Things positioned just so, where two little girls and their bikes be snatched and loaded up? Then the bikes dumped off on that remote section of the bike trail to make it look like those two went there on their own?
Oh :doh: they want to know "where"
I thought the call was in the bathroom at the Lake...
:waitasec:
IIRC it was from the parking lot of Casey's, but not the one MCM worked at.