IA IA - Elizabeth Collins, 8, & Lyric Cook, 10, Evansdale, 13 July 2012 - #28

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I am still convinced that the perp(s) left the girls where they were found because 7 bridges was a location known to the perp(s). I think the idea that they have some familiarity with Evansdale and Readyln is still one I am pretty well convinced of.
 
I'm convinced the perp (s) knew the area well. I 'think' the perp talked with at least one of the girls on the net and got them to trust him. Imoo the perp(s) are male, young...maybe in their late teens.
I also feel like this was a sexual crime.
I am sick that these 2 little girls, riding their bikes on a summer day were kidnapped and murdered.
God help LE find their killer (s). imo
 
Abben, July 23 (?): "important to note that they were riding away from Meyers Lake"

The children were riding "away," the "wrong way? (wallace and Grommit?) " Was the perp backing up? ... going the wrong way ... a white van backed up and poof ... girls gone?

That is, what does Abben mean when he describes the children as riding away from Meyers liake, on Brovan, at 12:15 ish on July 13, 2012.
 
Abben, July 23 (?): "important to note that they were riding away from Meyers Lake"

The children were riding "away," the "wrong way? (wallace and Grommit?) " Was the perp backing up? ... going the wrong way ... a white van backed up and poof ... girls gone?

That is, what does Abben mean when he describes the children as riding away from Meyers liake, on Brovan, at 12:15 ish on July 13, 2012.


Maybe not riding in the direction of the lake? Good question.
 
Abben, July 23 (?): "important to note that they were riding away from Meyers Lake"

The children were riding "away," the "wrong way? (wallace and Grommit?) " Was the perp backing up? ... going the wrong way ... a white van backed up and poof ... girls gone?

That is, what does Abben mean when he describes the children as riding away from Meyers liake, on Brovan, at 12:15 ish on July 13, 2012.


I think he meant that they were heading WNW on Brovan and that Meyers Lake was roughly in the opposite direction.
 
Abben, July 23 (?): "important to note that they were riding away from Meyers Lake"

The children were riding "away," the "wrong way? (wallace and Grommit?) " Was the perp backing up? ... going the wrong way ... a white van backed up and poof ... girls gone?

That is, what does Abben mean when he describes the children as riding away from Meyers liake, on Brovan, at 12:15 ish on July 13, 2012.

See...this is the stuff that annoys me...if it's important to note that the girls were riding away from the lake, then WHY do they mention that they were last seen in the area of the lake?!!! Why are they asking people who have any information of the girls being in the area of Gilbert, Arbutus, Lake Ave area to call with information?

Which one is it Abben?!! :banghead:

Either we need to note they were riding away from the lake AND THAT MATTERS or they were last seen in the area of the lake AND THAT MATTERS and it does NOT matter that the video happened to catch them riding "away" from the lake (still don't get how/why they think that's away).

The ONLY thing that I think could be a key to the "away" part...is IF someone (could be a friend of the girls) DID know that these girls frequented the lake, and the way the girls rode when they went to the lake was NOT the route they were riding that day.

What I mean is, if so and so comes forward and says Mr. Officer...I know Lizzy and Lyric went to the lake almost every day because I've ridden with them before. Mr Officer: What way did you guys ride? Witness: We always took the Evansdale Nature Trail because my mom wouldn't let me ride down River Forest because it's too busy.

Maybe something like that is what prompted the "away" comment. Who flippin' knows.:banghead:
 
Looks like one of Dan's accomplices got jailed yesterday!!!!

http://www.bhcso.org/WhosInJail.aspx

http://www.kwwl.com/story/19152101/search-for-missing-girls-continues


<modsnip>

:jail::jail::jail::jail::jail::jail::jail::jail::jail::jail::jail::jail::jail::jail::jail::jail::jail::

Ty. The female accomplice, right?

I'm not sure I fully understand how to read the report link above. It appears to me that she was arrested on 2/9/13 and paid to get out of jail the same day. Is that right?

To me the implication is that she's still using meth. How on earth is LE going to manage to round up her and any others like her in order to get them to DM's trial to testify???? IDK...
 
I'm confused. Initials???

CB...female!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The 2nd article on my post discusses her involvement with Dan and her guilty plea. The first article on my post shows a new arrest on 2/9/13.
 
Ty. The female accomplice, right?

I'm not sure I fully understand how to read the report link above. It appears to me that she was arrested on 2/9/13 and paid to get out of jail the same day. Is that right?
To me the implication is that she's still using meth. How on earth is LE going to manage to round up her and any others like her in order to get them to DM's trial to testify???? IDK...

Her total bond is over 100K...It appears that she paid bond on 2 of the 8 charges only (drug paraph, marijuana), but not the others. The 4 charges of Probation Violation alone have bonds of $25k each, which she hasn't paid yet.
 
Wow......i didnt know sleuthing all these people who are not considered suspects in this case was allowed.

Did the rules change and i am unaware?

thanks

artzy
 
Her total bond is over 100K...It appears that she paid bond on 2 of the 8 charges only (drug paraph, marijuana), but not the others. The 4 charges of Probation Violation alone have bonds of $25k each, which she hasn't paid yet.

Ty Rner! That's exactly how I took it upon first reading... then I had "talked myself out of that idea," in part because it doesn't make any sense to me why she would pay any amt towards the bond if she couldn't pay the entire amt.

Whew... I for one feel better now.
 
See...this is the stuff that annoys me...if it's important to note that the girls were riding away from the lake, then WHY do they mention that they were last seen in the area of the lake?!!! Why are they asking people who have any information of the girls being in the area of Gilbert, Arbutus, Lake Ave area to call with information?

Which one is it Abben?!! :banghead:

Either we need to note they were riding away from the lake AND THAT MATTERS or they were last seen in the area of the lake AND THAT MATTERS and it does NOT matter that the video happened to catch them riding "away" from the lake (still don't get how/why they think that's away).

The ONLY thing that I think could be a key to the "away" part...is IF someone (could be a friend of the girls) DID know that these girls frequented the lake, and the way the girls rode when they went to the lake was NOT the route they were riding that day.

What I mean is, if so and so comes forward and says Mr. Officer...I know Lizzy and Lyric went to the lake almost every day because I've ridden with them before. Mr Officer: What way did you guys ride? Witness: We always took the Evansdale Nature Trail because my mom wouldn't let me ride down River Forest because it's too busy.

Maybe something like that is what prompted the "away" comment. Who flippin' knows.:banghead:

I suppose that when the tape was released, that was where the girls were last seen. In September, more information was released and then the girls were placed in the area of Elmer and Gilbert between 12:30 and 1 PM.
 
Wow......i didnt know sleuthing all these people who are not considered suspects in this case was allowed.

Did the rules change and i am unaware?

thanks

artzy

no, they did not.... Reminder: no sleuthing of persons not connected to the case.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
108
Guests online
209
Total visitors
317

Forum statistics

Threads
609,500
Messages
18,254,962
Members
234,665
Latest member
wrongplatform
Back
Top