SapphireSteel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2012
- Messages
- 6,788
- Reaction score
- 105
Do you believe that Mr C saw the girls between 12-3?
Yes I do.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you believe that Mr C saw the girls between 12-3?
I really am failing to see the humor here. Two girls are dead. The killer is still on the loose as far as anyone here knows for a fact.
Yes but maybe not. The sighting on Brovan was of the girls. The sighting at the lake by TG was of two bikes.
As far as I know, LE has never confirmed the Brovan sighting, either, so it belongs in the same arena as TG's sighting as it is just as likely to be "made up" by someone trying to "insert themselves into the investigation".
The only difference is, we don't know the 12.23 witnesses name, so he/she's not being doubted or sleuthed.
Also I am mindful of the fact that TG never claimed to have sighted the girls, or even the girls bikes .
He merely claimed to have swerved past two childrens bikes on that path at that time.
That's it. He sighted two bikes...yet for this he is being dismissed and doubted.
Could the girls be on their bikes in one part of town and two random bikes be dumped in another part of town at the same time?
Obviously the answer is YES.
My reference to the word "Blabbermouth" was my humour.
Sorry if you misunderstood. We have been tossing that word around at work this week totally unrelated to the girls.
Just a bit a levity. Again, sorry If you misunderstood. :blushing::blushing::blushing:
see my post to understand. TIA.
Here it is -
Just as you have problems with fitting the timing in, I have problems seeing how it doesn't fit.
What exactly is it that makes the above so unlikely, in your mind?
I've been going crazy wanting to share this with everyone, Johnny if you're watching get in here as soon as you can to fill us 9in on what you know.
http://www.tennessean.com/local/archives/03/08/37523949.shtml?Element_ID=37523949
"''We thought that students and their parents needed to know that the Police Department needs and wants their assistance,'' Metro police spokesman Don Aaron said. ''This business card is also something we would like to know more about.'' The card has several pastel colors with heart-shaped balloons in the background. On the right side of the cards is a picture of Winnie the Pooh holding a pink heart-shaped pillow. The card has Tabitha's name, address and phone number on it and has the words ''call me'' written below.
The card also contains the words ''sexy girl'' marked out and replaced with the words ''ghetto girl,'' a person familiar with the investigation said. That information was blacked out in the copy that was sent home to parents.
Police found the card the night Tabitha disappeared. It was with several others in a bowl on her dresser, Aaron said. Police do not know who created them, why they were made or what use they might have been to Tabitha. Police want to know if the cards hold any clues to her whereabouts.
In a telephone interview last night, Debra Tuders said she had no idea why her daughter had the card. ''I remember seeing one in her room, and they took it,'' Debra Tuders said of police. ''She just had it in her desk. She never used it or nothing like that.''"
I am curious about the "jogger" sighting..
What did the "jogger" supposedly see, bikes or girls?
Was the "jogger" information released AFTER TG made his "public debut"?
Could "biker", who came out publically and probably later regretted it, actually be the "jogger", who has been kept out of the spotlight, but considered a "witness" by LE?
I know what TG has claimed to have seen and his questionable timeline. Is it possible that after all the media and public exposure as a potential "witness" to something of importance, he felt harassed, stalked, and fearful for his safety? After all, he spoke about people trespassing on his property and taking pictures. His daughter stated that she went to LE about it. So, is it also possible that he was given an identity as the "unknown" jogger to throw his sighting into the timeline without publically acknowledging his sighting?
I think it IS possible.
I am curious about the "jogger" sighting..
What did the "jogger" supposedly see, bikes or girls?
Was the "jogger" information released AFTER TG made his "public debut"?
Could "biker", who came out publically and probably later regretted it, actually be the "jogger", who has been kept out of the spotlight, but considered a "witness" by LE?
I know what TG has claimed to have seen and his questionable timeline. Is it possible that after all the media and public exposure as a potential "witness" to something of importance, he felt harassed, stalked, and fearful for his safety? After all, he spoke about people trespassing on his property and taking pictures. His daughter stated that she went to LE about it. So, is it also possible that he was given an identity as the "unknown" jogger to throw his sighting into the timeline without publically acknowledging his sighting?
I think it IS possible.
I am curious about the "jogger" sighting..
What did the "jogger" supposedly see, bikes or girls?
Was the "jogger" information released AFTER TG made his "public debut"?
Could "biker", who came out publically and probably later regretted it, actually be the "jogger", who has been kept out of the spotlight, but considered a "witness" by LE?
I know what TG has claimed to have seen and his questionable timeline. Is it possible that after all the media and public exposure as a potential "witness" to something of importance, he felt harassed, stalked, and fearful for his safety? After all, he spoke about people trespassing on his property and taking pictures. His daughter stated that she went to LE about it. So, is it also possible that he was given an identity as the "unknown" jogger to throw his sighting into the timeline without publically acknowledging his sighting?
I think it IS possible.
Anyway, I emailed Tony Thompson and you're right Cinder, he would not comment on the case. I find this very odd. He is the sheriff, and Abben is his "underling"... but yet the bhcso cant comment???? Hr said the Evansdale Pd is the lead agency, with assistance from the FBI, DCI, and "several other agencies, including the bremer county sheriffs office.
I also said that I'm very concerned, as I have a 12 year old daughter. His response was "the case is still very much an active investigation. Action continues to happen weekly, but no arrests have been pursued at this point."
I am somewhat miffed at this response, but on the other hand, I can understand not wanting to give out any information that hasn't already been shared. I will see if the bremer county sheriff can at least give the location of the bodies. Or maybe we should inquire with the Tv station that took the heli pictures. KCRG??
As far as the comment that locals don't seem to care if the case is solved, I strongly disagree. We have simply run out of ideas.
So no scuttlebutt about town as far as "we all know the person in custody did it". . . :jail:
Anyway, I emailed Tony Thompson and you're right Cinder, he would not comment on the case. I find this very odd. He is the sheriff, and Abben is his "underling"... but yet the bhcso cant comment???? Hr said the Evansdale Pd is the lead agency, with assistance from the FBI, DCI, and "several other agencies, including the bremer county sheriffs office.
I also said that I'm very concerned, as I have a 12 year old daughter. His response was "the case is still very much an active investigation. Action continues to happen weekly, but no arrests have been pursued at this point."
I am somewhat miffed at this response, but on the other hand, I can understand not wanting to give out any information that hasn't already been shared. I will see if the bremer county sheriff can at least give the location of the bodies. Or maybe we should inquire with the Tv station that took the heli pictures. KCRG??
As far as the comment that locals don't seem to care if the case is solved, I strongly disagree. We have simply run out of ideas.
So if we are to make TG's sighting fit into the two confirmed sightings (per LE) of 12:15 and 12:23, we have to believe that "approximately 12:20" actually means 12:26?
I tend to think "approximately 12:20" means a couple of minutes either way (12:18 to 12:22). I certainly don't think it means 12:26. JMO. That is why I don't see how TG's sighting is possible since the girls were seen on Brovan at 12:23.
We'll definitely have to disagree on whether TG's sighting is valid or not.
Can you please link to where LE declared the last confirmed sighting is 12.23?
TIA