SharonNeedles
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 18, 2018
- Messages
- 1,611
- Reaction score
- 17,033
Actually I think this new map tells us a lot. Watch this video again. At 1:30 I'm driving West on Historic US 6, then I turn right onto 385th Ave. That section of 385th Ave. (one of the highlighted areas) is gravel then dirt. Yes, dirt. Mollie is not going to run down that road. Out of towners are not going to come in to town that way. And once it rains nobody is going down that road except for 4wd mud runners who will leave evidence of it. The only conceivable reason that section of road is highlighted is that somehow Mollie can be placed there. Note it's that's the quickest and easiest route from DJ's house to Grinnell when it's dry.
Go to 12:10 in the video, as I'm heading West down 2nd street you'll see that carwash on my right. What's the significance of a carwash in Brooklyn? It's right along Mollie's running route. I didn't pay any mind to it, it would be a terrible place to try to snatch somebody unnoticed at 7:30pm at night. But what if she saw someone she knows there? What if she stopped and talked, then got in the car and caught a lift back to the house? It's a straight shot to DJ's house from there. And we know we're looking at that carwash in reference to Wednesday night before it rained.
More then likely has and will continue to. Sex offenders continue this behavior until they are caught and put into prison. How many times have you heard of a sex offender getting out and within a day/week/month commit another sex offense. You can't fix this. These people can not be rehabilitated.This is just all strictly my own opinion but I just can’t shake the feeling that whoever is involved in this has done this before and will again if not apprehended. If we go on what information we have that’s been confirmed (there isn’t much of it) then this person has so far caused Molly to disappear into thin air. There has to be some level of planning that went into it. Again if we go off of what LE has released this whole thing has been far from sloppy or a spur of the moment attack. Again I’m truly hoping that LE knows a lot more than we do but if they don’t that’s truly a scary thought.![]()
That's actually the angle I've been coming from all along, I don't fancy myself much of a sluether at all.At exactly 12:25 on the right.
Thanks for doing this, SharonNeedles. I could hear the sadness in your voice once you saw RT. You weren't just a sleuther then. You were a Dad feeling another Dad's pain.
Or possibly a backdoor route into town ?
I feel they would say that regardless of what they really thought. If they said the public were not safe it would cause pandemonium.I do not think LE believes this was a random abduction as they are saying the general public should not feel afraid. They would not just irresponsibly say that. imo Mollie was who was targeted specifically and we don't know the reason yet. They are telling us the town is safe, they don't have a crazy monster running around waiting and lurking to take your daughter or wife. This was intentional towards Mollie.
I watched the PC at work and may have missed them saying they believe she is still live. I did hear him say she is still a missing person. Can anyone confirm the "alive" statement? Thanks!
I could hardly hear the speaker and did not hear the questions? After waiting and wondering couldn't they have at least made it loud enough to hear???He likely heard what we did. Nothing.
I do not think LE believes this was a random abduction as they are saying the general public should not feel afraid. They would not just irresponsibly say that. imo Mollie was who was targeted specifically and we don't know the reason yet. They are telling us the town is safe, they don't have a crazy monster running around waiting and lurking to take your daughter or wife. This was intentional towards Mollie.
Is there a post that recorded the PC from today? I wasn’t able to see the the first part? Could someone please post or tell me where I can view it?
Were there cell phone towers near them?I did my best to try and find those locations on Google Maps satellite view. They appear to be remote, open land areas. Google doesn't even have Streetviews of the roads near them.
Yes exactly. The whole "have you noticed any behavioral changes in someone, cleaning a car, etc" thing is pretty standard for cases like this. I've seen it countless times before. And surely they have been considering all possibilities from the get go, no? So why did it take them almost a month to request this information? The farther back you request of people's memories, the less likely you are to get solid info. If people initially were thinking she left on her own they wouldn't have been as hyper vigilant about changes in someone's behavior. They can look back now, but their memories are sure to be cloudier.Hey Magnum. I asked you earlier in a previous thread (just before it closed), but do you have any idea why LE would only now mention that a person involved in this abduction would exhibit behavioral and appearance changes (in addition to other noticeable behavior)? I have expressed frustration since the early threads in regard to them not putting this information out there. I just can’t figure out why the delay?
Agreed. It seems like that’s their standard response until it is undeniably not so.I feel they would say that regardless of what they really thought. If they said the public were not safe it would cause pandemonium.
Agreed plus he’s not going to come back to town to try it again with half of Iowa’s LE searching for him.I feel they would say that regardless of what they really thought. If they said the public were not safe it would cause pandemonium.
There's a tower out by Deep River, off 21.Were there cell phone towers near them?