Trouble1321075
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2019
- Messages
- 518
- Reaction score
- 3,473
they weren't present. They were on a different floor and saw nothing. There were other people there when the 911 call was made, it's possible that these people saw more of the aftermath than the 2 unharmed roomies did. Someone else already said this, but the most valuable things they most likely shared with police were the comings and goings in the house, possibly tips on weird or creepy people who may have come in at a party. LE has already "cleared" certain people mainly because social media was all over them, possibly making them targets and putting their own lives and reputations in danger.
WADR to everyone who has responded to what I said.It is a legal term, the 4th A guarantees it to all citizens, and some states have heightened expectations. I am not sure that the expectation of privacy referred to by @CSIDreamer is regarding the 4A, but regardless, there is nothing that would require someone to speak to the media, and much harm can come from it. A little info, but you can do an interesting deep dive, too: expectation of privacy
and think about it this way: if you were one of the two surviving victims would you: 1. be more interested in protecting yourself and the details of the case that may help solve it, or 2. prioritize satiating the curiosity of tabloid readers, etc. for some fast cash? I'd choose option 1.
edited to take out name of specific publication
I think maybe I was not being clear and been misinterpreted.
My response was to another poster who suggested that the details surrounding their lives could be an Important part of solving this crime. That in my view is correct.
People seem to think I'm saying they must speak to the police and/or the media. I am not saying that.
I am saying certain events in their lives are a matter of public interest. Sadly they were present even if unaware while a quadruple murder was occurring. What they may of heard or saw is of interest. Where they were and what they did is of interest.
Again to be clear I am not judging them or casting dispersions on their silence. They need to do what's right for them and I support that.
That being said I also believe they have a moral obligation or civic responsibility to help in any way they can. That is all I was saying and it was in response to a specific posters perspective. I hope that puts what I said in better perspective.
I'm not accusing anyone of doing anything wrong.