I don't know what "be vigilant" even means. I'm not trying to be difficult about this but it's so ambiguous it means nothing. Should we go around assuming that everyone we come into contact with including the police, are sadistic serial killers, just to be on the safe side? In the morning before going to work should I request a police presence to watch me walk from my door to my car, just in case someone is watching. Is that me exercising due diligence? Without context their words are nothing more than empty platitudes.
Interesting you mention “be vigilant”.
I’ve actually talked about this before, based on what I learned from Jessica Ridgeway’s case. I’ve said before, that when LE says “be vigilant”, that is code for “Houston we have a problem” and “there’s a dangerous person on the loose” that could strike again, imo. I’ve even waited for LE to say this in certain PCs, specifically to gauge if this is what they think, that the killer could strike again. I’ve said before here “If LE says ‘Be vigilant’, then we’re in trouble.”
Which brings me to the next point - I was watching “Predator At Large”, about the abduction and murder of poor little Samantha Runyon. LE clearly outright said they think he will do this again. Now, this was based on different things, child predator, sexual assault, and particularly her body been disgustingly “staged”. I was thinking about how in other cases I’ve heard LE say for sure they think this predator will strike again.
So I was thinking, has LE come out outright and said this here? If they have I missed it, and I’m wondering, as far as the “targeted” thing, if this contradicts this assumption that he will strike again. But then they say “Be Vigilant,” which imo and experience is cop language for “be very very careful because he is still out there and could strike again”.
—-
Eta: Perhaps LE is using this term more generally in this case, in an answer to the community about “what we as community members can do in this situation”. But I DO wonder specifically based on what I mentioned above, and also wonder because often BAU/FBI, one of the main things they do is evaluate the probability of whether or not they think a predator is likely to commit the crime again, but the cases I refer to usually involve sexually motivated abductions and murders. Sometimes LE comes flat out and says this, “we think this person could strike again”, if not hinting with code words “Be vigilant”, imo.