I see this a lot here. However, what SG says about who is and who isn’t a suspect is irrelevant-it’s what LE says that matters, which is what they keep reiterating -to stick to information given by them.
The key issue, to me, is whether or not the mention of Adam has anything to do with the murders. Many think it doesn’t, but I don’t know how anyone would know that. I think it’s entirely possible that it doesn’t, and entirely possible that it does.
I guess if one already has formed an opinion between two options, one being a stranger killer and one being a known killer, you could place this “Adam mention” into one of those theories. I’m keeping an open mind, though, especially as pieces of information about that night and events and people related to the victims continue to become known.
I think it’s certainly possible that telling Adam -whoever he is, and we don’t even know that for sure- “everything” might have put someone on the spot. Might have triggered someone who was already frustrated, angry, jealous….