KBlackRabbit
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2021
- Messages
- 192
- Reaction score
- 2,486
Point well taken regarding the amendment error.
The psychic, however, is in Texas and the suit is federal. As result, Idaho laws do not apply.
That aside, whether or not someone deserves to be sued, and whether or not it is prudent to sue somebody can be two entirely different cases. This maybe one of those cases.
I imagine that Tic Tok will ban her account very soon. Likewise I imagine that with a little imagination (or with the assistance of a 'net wise 14 year old), she can find new platforms that wont ban her and that care little about US federal suits. Meanwhile, I would not be surprised if her viewership is going through the roof.
I dont know what federal court calendars look like. They only thing that may stop her is fear of confinement (maybe via contempt of Court? But... how easily can a person be ordered by a Court to stop a civil suit action before being found libelous by a jury?
Then there is the matter of what can be collected from a tic tok psychic. In short, it might have better to have ignored her.
Hard to ignore her when your life is turned upside down, you’re being attacked by a social media mob, and your family, home, and entire career is being threatened because of her. Yes, I think it’s prudent to sue her, she’s trying to destroy an innocent woman’s life. The defendant was sent two cease & desists and did not remove her videos or retract her statements. Defamation per se stands in federal court (again, Cardi B).
The professor is the victim and I think she deserves and it is prudent for her to seek a legal remedy regardless of whether TikTok or other platforms remove the defendant’s accounts or not.
Last edited: