krig101
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2013
- Messages
- 3,768
- Reaction score
- 94
Sadly I agreeAlso investigators found no evidence that the little one wandered off. Leaves only foul play in my opinion.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
Sadly I agreeAlso investigators found no evidence that the little one wandered off. Leaves only foul play in my opinion.
I found that statement very interesting about other parties. (Not sure how to bring your quote forward [emoji3] )
Who is this aimed at?
I have to say, he lost me at "poured." That said, I do suppose the statement narrows the possibilities somewhat. JMO.
Regarding statements Klein Investigations made about having a direct witness come forward last weekend, very curious about this.If you have a reasonable, plausible theory, and the facts to back it up, you can post it. Just remember that it's not so much what you say, as how you say it. Tone and intent count for a lot.
ETA: I'd suggest also reading carefully through this thread.
https://www.facebook.com/KleinInvestigations/posts/937132659702652
A Klein response to a readers question on fb
.
The whole Rubicon thing was started by some other woman in some other campground (Palisades and Swan Valley).
She said a weird guy in a black Rubicon was staring at her family.
Klein said it was not related to the DeOrr case so we need to dump the black Rubicon theory for once and for all
Klein Investigations and Consulting Through the time line - we belive [sic] he was on the mountian [sic].
Like · Reply · 6 · January 11 at 2:08pm
https://www.facebook.com/KleinInvestigations/posts/937132659702652
The campsite is on a mountain.Just wondering why they word it as 'on the mountain' versus at the campground. Was the campground on a mountain? Everything seems carefully worded in this case...
Reading this latest report I'm now thinking of a scenario that could possibly fit/explain some things but am nowhere near ready to post about it yet.
IMO they are on the right path but are being very careful not to reveal what they know. Thinking Deorr was on the mountain vs campground also has me wondering....Just wondering why they word it as 'on the mountain' versus at the campground. Was the campground on a mountain? Everything seems carefully worded in this case...
Reading this latest report I'm now thinking of a scenario that could possibly fit/explain some things but am nowhere near ready to post about it yet.
I wouldn't read too much into mountain vs campground, honestly. It makes more sense when you read it in context. Other statements also suggest they believe he was with the group at the camp site.IMO they are on the right path but are being very careful not to reveal what they know. Thinking Deorr was on the mountain vs campground also has me wondering....
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
I think I just get confused about the geography of the campground. I still don't know what to think. Hope answers are coming soon!I wouldn't read too much into mountain vs campground, honestly. It makes more sense when you read it in context. Other statements also suggest they believe he was with the group at the camp site.
Just wondering why they word it as 'on the mountain' versus at the campground. Was the campground on a mountain? Everything seems carefully worded in this case...
Reading this latest report I'm now thinking of a scenario that could possibly fit/explain some things but am nowhere near ready to post about it yet.
Okay there is no way they could have definitively determined that he wasn't attacked by a mountain lion.
Thank you. I was going to post the same regarding no evidence to show he wandered off and fell beneath a rock, for example. I'll forego the mountain lion, but not the possibility that his little body became hidden in the terrain without a trace left behind. JMOOkay there is no way they could have definitively determined that he wasn't attacked by a mountain lion. The absence of evidence doesn't prove a positive...now I'm not being eloquent...but yeah, this report is underwhelming to say the least.
Okay there is no way they could have definitively determined that he wasn't attacked by a mountain lion. The absence of evidence doesn't prove a positive...now I'm not being eloquent...but yeah, this report is underwhelming to say the least.
I agree. He could still have just wondered off. I am just wondering if this new "witness" gave a credible lead that dismissed that theory. Wish we knew more, but I know there are reasons for that.Thank you. I was going to post the same regarding no evidence to show he wandered off and fell beneath a rock, for example. I'll forego the mountain lion, but not the possibility that his little body became hidden in the terrain without a trace left behind. JMO
Oh but there is a way if you think about it for a minute...
True, but then it would be ruled out based on evidence, not on "no evidence".IMO they could rule it out if the recent witness is credible and the information provided and/or other supporting evidence excludes it.