Please provide links to the police statements and the statement by the grandfather.After reading police statements and a statement from the grandpa, I believe the parents and grandpa are innocent. The grandpa stated that there was a four minute window where no one was paying attention to DeOrr because they assumed the other one was. So, eliminating those three people, what are the possible scenarios? How close were they to water?
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
How can it be called a four minute window of time when no one had an eye on DeOrr; he has never been seen since that time. He was there and then he was gone; four minutes is completely irrelevant. I guess the grandfather is trying to say he was distracted for about four minutes?Original People Magazine Article being referred to
http://www.people.com/article/missing-boy-idaho-grandfather-speaks
There's a four-minute window where no one had an eye on him," says Kunz, 70. "My grandson is paying the ultimate price for this."
I think it's a mix of remorse and maybe showing how fast he was gone. Every parent takes their eyes off their toddler at some point, and unfortunately, in this case, it became a nightmare. I feel so badly for them. I cannot even imagine their pain.How can it be called a four minute window of time when no one had an eye on DeOrr; he has never been seen since that time. He was there and then he was gone; four minutes is completely irrelevant. I guess the grandfather is trying to say he was distracted for about four minutes?
How can it be called a four minute window of time when no one had an eye on DeOrr; he has never been seen since that time. He was there and then he was gone; four minutes is completely irrelevant. I guess the grandfather is trying to say he was distracted for about four minutes?
Yeah, I assumed he was told this by the family and was just relaying the info.This quote is from DeOrr's 'other' G'Father who was not there. He also is quoted by People as specifying 'the blanket' was found in the truck. He came to know this information by someone close that he felt comfortable enough the information was true to relay to People Mag. All JMO
We've discussed the People Magazine article pretty extensively months ago. The grandfather being quoted was NOT at the campground. Basically that article was just really poorly written and has added to the confusion/misinformation that has plagued this case.
To me it seems most likely there has been no criminal act here at all. Rather there has been a very unfortunate incident that is difficult to understand and accept. I feel badly for all involved.
I'm not sure why you came to that conclusion though? I realize he wasn't there, but are you saying he gave not accurate information? I'm confused.
Has there been a timeline set up recently?
There is nothing confusing about it. The article was very poorly written and the reporters did not check any of the "facts" that the grandfather, who wasn't there, stated. It's People magazine, not necessarily known for hard-hitting fact-based reporting.
I keep checking back and hoping a big "FOUND" will be added to the title. This situation is so sad.