IR was within his rights when he refused to answer, or expound on, questions from the reporter. Unless I missed a chunk of the interview, not once did IR say that he refused to answer on the request or instruction of law enforcement. Klein made that insinuation.
The Sheriff cleared it up tonight when he said no, his office did not instruct IR not to answer questions. IR has hired an attorney. In all likelihood, his attorney coached him on how to respond to the reporter. That's not ipso facto an indication of pretense or deception. Rather, it's an intelligent decision, considering that we're talking about an interview with a media reporter. By the same token, he's not obliged to give an interview to a PI.
As long as he's upfront with LE, that's all that matters in the big picture. If a favorable media interview will spare him some grief, i.e., public scrutiny and rejection, stolen or destroyed bicycles, so be it. I say, go for it.
JMO
KLEIN: He gave us a couple of things that we can follow up on. There's a couple of things that we need to compare to the master timeline on this from all the witness statements.
We do get concerned with Mr. Reinwand because, again, he's not forthcoming. He'll be glad to tell you what he wants you to know, but he won't tell you the details of what he wants you to know. I know for a fact that LE has not asked him to be quiet.
They have not put any restrictions on him. Nobody can put any restrictions on him, so...that's a concerning statement for me. I think some of the motivation here is that he wants to get out ahead of it because, uh, I think everyone realizes that the light is out ahead of the tunnel on this thing.
http://www.eastidahonews.com/2016/01/kunz-private-investigator-responds-to-reinwand-interview/
REINWAND: I don’t want to comment on that.
REINWAND: No comment.
REINWAND: I’m not supposed to disclose any information. I’ve been asked not to.
REINWAND: No response.
http://www.eastidahonews.com/2016/01/isaac-reinwand-i-had-nothing-to-do-with-deorrs-disappearance/