In this interview, Klein stated:
"There was a cadaver dog that nobody knew about that did hit on a piece of equipment that was at the mountain."
http://m.localnews8.com/news/interv...ip-klein-on-deorr-kunz-investigation/38264866
In this interview, Klein stated:
"...there was a cadaver dog, that was brought in, to check certain pieces of equipment...the cadaver dog did hit in three certain areas of the pieces of equipment,
which does indicate that there was death, or there was some type of fluid, cerebral fluid, blood, whatever it may be, that was in the location where the dog hit and that we now know that there was a death." bbm
http://m.localnews8.com/news/private-investigator-cadaver-dog-proves-there-was-a-death/38307992
So is it one piece of equipment, or three pieces of equipment, or three hits all on the same one piece of equipment?
Also, for those who know a lot more about cadaver dogs than I do, would a cadaver dog hit on blood/body fluids in addition to cadaverine scent? If so, how would one be able to differentiate between what the dog actually hit on? And if the dog did hit on body fluids, wouldn't that evidence have been collected and wouldn't it be known by now what it was? Why doesn't he know exactly what the dog hit on? Also, if the dog hit on death scent OR fluids, then how does he know for sure that there was a death if he just gave us two possible scenarios?
I mean, we pretty much know that it is extremely likely that little DeOrr is no longer of this Earth
. But these are pretty strong comments for him to make in public, so I think that he should be exact in what he says, or not say anything at all at this point. Especially since nobody has been arrested or charged with anything as of yet.