neesaki
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2007
- Messages
- 16,011
- Reaction score
- 49,256
Thank you for that link. I re-listened to the interview & it is not as to which clear which discipline of dog Sheriff B is referring to regarding the "interesting activity". A cadaver dog handler knows when his dog has alerted by the passive freeze. I believe if there had been cadaver dog alerts to the campsite itself during the early searches (other than the one to the truck which proved inconclusive) then local LE would have placed the 4 adults under arrest almost immediately.
IMO IR has many reasons to be inconsistent & untruthful. I can only speculate what VDK & JA actually knew about him before they went on that trip with their son.
So are your thoughts along the line that LE is wrong, and the parents are innocent? Not to mention not one, but two private investigators? Please don't get me wrong as I'm honestly not trying to be cynical or challenging. I'm really just asking because I want to know what you're thinking. I'm interested in all theories at this point. I still believe the parents have guilt, whether just via knowledge or otherwise. And am again questioning IR after I listened again to what Sheriff B stated about him. For that matter, I have questions about GGP. :gaah:
This is one convoluted mess, isn't it? Yet what's more important, we have a missing little boy, whose name is Deorr.