Not_Important_
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2015
- Messages
- 83
- Reaction score
- 2
JMO, IMO, MOO, after trying to keep up with 6 threads,
deorr wasn't taken away by a wayward OCD remains-free non-rabid stealthy wild animal without a trace...
he was not abducted from what his own parents described as an isolated area (per DKsr) where there was no one around (per JM)
nor did he drown in a shallow reservoir barely three feet deep fed into by a creek searched by over 150 people...
not after one, maybe two hours as a toddler in clumsy cowboy boots so tired he was 'ready for a nap' left in front of a campfire (per DKsr) with two adults (per IR and hearsay from TC) without a sight...
and couldn't possibly, no matter how fast a two-year-old runs, could have travelled further than adults and german shepherds even FOUR hours out. been there, done that. I have three young boys. I'm an "older" mom and I'm still quicker.
stupid rabbit question, once again...aside from the cadaver/scent articles, has any one MSM article stated in fact that any dog (SAR or otherwise) picked up deorr's scent at or around the campsite? again, discard the "remains deposited in the reservoir" news...TIA!!!
Man, white rabbit. You and I must be on the same brain wave tonight. I think everyone in these threads has mulled(?) over every single theory possible ever since this case popped up and they keep coming back to just one or two theory. LE has said that wild animals or abduction were both unlikely, and the creek and reservoir were searched from top to bottom.
As for DeOrr even being at the campsite, there were links to FB comments made by one of the grandmothers that talked about this. Of course, take that with a giant pound of salt. Also, the video tape from the convenience store. Not for sure if that was actually confirmed to be DK and little DeOrr. So, besides that, it's just the word of the 4 adults at the campsite so far.