indicolite22
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2019
- Messages
- 10,312
- Reaction score
- 86,128
But what was the motive for taking the kids away? There were no threats to Tylee (ever) and not even JJ in the early September. The couple of emails that Kay sent to Lori by then were non-threatening. Did she keep in touch with the kids through Alex? What about after his death? Why did she spend all the kids' money on herself?I really think they're going to go down that road. Lori will claim she trusted Alex to take the children to someplace where other cultists would care for them, while Chad will claim Alex wanted to us his pet cemetery for animals he needed to bury. Since we know Alex' phone was pinging out there and Alex can't defend himself anymore (probably wouldn't, anyway), I think we can assume--barring actual DNA of Chad's found on the kids--they'll pin it all on Alex, and the jury will have enough question for reasonable doubt.
I sure hope it doesn't go down that way -- but I can see it happening, especially if they get a jury member who thinks along the same lines they think.
JMOO
Also, what animals? There's no indication that Alex kept pets. They barely just moved to Rexburg. Would you offer someone your pet cemetery to bury their pet? And where was Chad during those two hours Alex was there? Burning limbs and burying a raccoon?
ETA: If the paneling found on top of JJ's body came from Chad's barn, then he can't deny his active involvement. The green bucket found in Tylee's grave might also be his.
I think they'll have to come up with something better.
Last edited: