She also was laughing while the officer interviewed her. "Sorry neighbor"....Justin says in his report that police say, "Lori heard the shots fired, but drove off in Charles' rental car with her kids."
This version of the story has always bugged me. If she were outside and only "heard" the shots, she wouldn't know who was actually shot. She wouldn't know if Charles, who is supposedly in a rage, disarmed Alex, shot him and is now coming after her. She wouldn't know if her brother is OK. So as she drove off, why didn't she call 911?
I just hope everyone prepares themselves though, tomorrow may come and go and we find nothing out. I don't want people to get so worked up about finding something out tomorrow and finding out nothing and making themselves sick. These things can take absolute ages and ages.
I realize we can't sleuth them, but--does Tylee have relatives on her father's side, grandparents or aunts/uncles?
She has an aunt -- the sister of Tylee's father, Joseph Ryan, gave info for one of the MSM timelines posted. I don't recall which MSM timeline it was or her name off hand, but she verified the year Lori and Joe got married. I think that Joe's parents might be deceased (possibly said in a Grey Hughes video, but I can't confirm).
Also, Tylee has her older half-brother Colby. I wonder what he thinks of his mom jetting off to Hawaii with husband #5 and not saying anything about Tylee and JJ?
I was wondering whether she has someplace else to go if she is alive and her mother is in as much trouble as it seems.
Yes, if the kids are not presented then Idaho will motion for emergency custody of the children (ex parte if Lori doesn't show) and if that is granted (I expect it will) then another motion order will be added for law enforcement to take the children into custody whenever or wherever found. While this will be bound to Idaho it will go to NCIC. After that Lori will likely be arrested on custodial interference charges but I expect if she doesn't show a bench warrant to appear might be issued first as that would make extradition far easier.Y’know, that list someone had might be useful.
Yes Lori, yes kids - We’d hear about this, because Lori would want to rub it in.
Yes LorI, no kids - Somebody would almost certainly see her somewhere and talk, but I put the odds of this happening at less than 1%, anyway.
No Lori, yes kids - I think we’d get told this, to know to stop looking for them, but then we’d be told little or nothing of what was happening next.
No Lori, no kids - This is what we expect to happen. It will almost certainly be followed by a custody order that places custody with the state (or *maybe* but probably not, at least yet, with the Woodcocks in JJ’s case) and we will not be told about it.
Then, within a few days, I imagine, a warrant will go out for Lori. At least one of the charges will be for felony child custody interference in Idaho. That, we’ll hear when she’s arrested... or when she manages to skip out.
I’m not entirely sure the law is broad enough to be used on Chad, too. Maybe? It appears to be, with its inclusion of “parent, or other, or agent of that person”. Actually, I’m pretty sure it would also then apply to whomever else might have the kids, too. Ouch. If someone really did have the kids (which I doubt), I’d hope that’d be more than they were bargaining for.
And yes, it would be applicable to temporary orders, even those created after the child is missing.
Oh, and it’s a form of kidnapping. That’s the chapter heading, lol. So all those splitting hairs were irrelevant.
So while we might not be TOLD, we’re gonna have a pretty good guess.
If they have evidence the kids are deceased, though... all bets are off.
And Colby has a child - Lori is a grandmother. I shouldn't be shocked by anything at this point. But I am.
Nothing about what I've read says Chandler LE believes the story they were told. But Alex is dead and even if they think they could prove he shot Charles in cold blood, it's a moot point because he can no longer be tried.
It is interesting that they're keeping it open because of the children's case. I wouldn't think there was a connection...but I've wondered that before.
Yep...
I once read a book about a foster mother who was abusing and killed one of the children she adopted. This was in 1965. She wasn't charged until 1987 because the birth mother went looking for the child she gave up for adoption. It is sick and horrifying that Lois Jurgens got away with this for so long.
I hope the prosecutors in Idaho remember this case, although I doubt it.
![]()
A Death in White Bear Lake: Notorious crime in city history marks 50 years
Lois Jurgens | Photos | Murderpedia, the encyclopedia of murderers
Lois Jurgens - Wikipedia
We would have to see the order to know. If it doesn't say that she must appear then anyone at all can show up with the children.Does Lori have to produce children in person or can (for instance) a member of her family do it?
Nothing about what I've read says Chandler LE believes the story they were told. But Alex is dead and even if they think they could prove he shot Charles in cold blood, it's a moot point because he can no longer be tried.
It is interesting that they're keeping it open because of the children's case. I wouldn't think there was a connection...but I've wondered that before.
I would reckon Cad and Lori wish they had the kids right now for someone to trot them out. Actually be shocked if that happens.Does Lori have to produce children in person or can (for instance) a member of her family do it?
80% chance the weather is an excuse they cant make it. In the meantime, everyone else gets to their jobs on time, for the most part.All quiet here in Rexburg at the moment. No media circus. Nothing of interest at POI's lawyer's office. Courthouse is quiet. PD has normal traffic. Calm before the storm? Or are they anticipating non-action here?
I haven't been over to Health and Welfare, but I imagine it's about the same.
60% chance of snow overnight. High tomorrow around 28˚F. Lori better bundle up.
Perhaps a conspiracy charge for Lori in the death of CV?I wonder if they might have plans to charge Lori as an accessory or something in Charles' death, but only if they can produce Tylee as a witness? Lori apparently gave conflicting stories on what happened. And we don't know what Tylee's version of events was at all. I also wonder what happens in a case if police have one person admitting they shot someone in self defense but police suspect the person confessing is lying and covering for someone else? They may have suspected something like that was going on but couldn't prove it. Maybe they were hoping to interview JJ and re-interview Tylee without Lori present? If that's the case, then I can see why they would say the case is still open while the kids are missing. MOO.