I'd love to know more about what would cause a judge to order cameras to be put in the home to protect the children. That's something I haven't heard of before...
Im thinking it had something to do with what her sons told her after returning from summers/holidays with Charles. She said she didn't interact with Lori much, so doubtful its something she witnessed. Probably something like
Sons to mom:"Mom, dads new wife does X and its really weird"
Mom to Charles: "Kids are saying Lori is doing X"
Charles to Lori: "Are you doing X"
Lori to Charles: "No, never, its all made up"
Mom to Court: "Kids say X is happening when they're there, but Lori denies it"
Judge to Lori: "Camera time!"
Couldn't have been anything too drastic like assault/abuse, otherwise I'm not sure the boys mother would be alright with sending them back to that environment, cameras or not. I'm wondering if it was something like making the boys watch the younger kids while she went out all day. Other not so drastic threats to the older kids that cameras would catch? Smoking in the house? Other substance use? Most of the things I would think of (harsh discipline, neglect) wouldn't really apply to Charles' older sons whose protection the cameras were theoretically for. They were old enough to mostly take care of themselves, and way too big for spankings.
*EDIT* Just had a thought, maybe she wasn't being mean to the boys, but too nice. She's much younger than Charles, maybe she was dressing in a way that the boys felt was inappropriate or being too touchy for a stepmom.