Blame it on WS but my mind goes to the deepest, dark places. I hate it when that happens.
No further comment on the subject at this time. :shame:
The info that Lt. Gliniewicz was planning to retire at the end of the year but, suddenly, pushed his retirement up to the end of September is somewhat disturbing for some reason imo.
Yesterday I heard the exact opposite reported on the news, that he had extended his service so as to carry on his work with the training club he led.
In other words, according to his original plan, he would have retired already. Go figure!
One innocent idea is that his retirement could have been requested to take place earlier due to Illinois budget contraints/changes which could have threatened any outside programs too.
WS is very useful for documenting cases as they're unfolding and for showing mistakes in early reporting (too many!) and the corrections that are evident later.
Like other posters have noted, LE's response to this case has a different vibe than that of similar cases imo. Can't put my finger on why every piece of info gathered is top secret unless LE has too many unanswered questions - like two plus two isn't equalling four.
They seem to be waiting on forensics to help clarify a scenario.
The poster who pointed out that three people may have walked into their nearby workplace/s right on time as if it were any other day seems a brilliant idea imo.
Why couldn't this scenario be true?
Wonder if the dogs walked anywhere and what scent would they be tracking exactly?