Chuz Life
Voluntary Investigator
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2012
- Messages
- 763
- Reaction score
- 23
No. not a 4th suspect. Omg, I posted this already. Someone who happened upon the scene after he radio'd the three in and believed that person was there to help with back up. Someone he believed was there for back up or to help him. Someone who he wouldn't have 'the stance' with.... someone who he felt comfortable around that he trusted. You guys know the stance, the one cops have when speaking to someone and they are kind of on the defense when they first talk to a person.....
I hope that makes sense. It's the same one/single theory I have had all along on how someone could get close enough to him to gain control of his weapon.
hth
I love a good conspiracy theory, Cubby and I've been giving this one of yours some thought like I said I would. I do have to say it's not easy for me because I have my own theories. So, I'm trying to start with a blank slate.
For starters, we have to consider the little evidence that we do have that's not likely to change.
We have the recorded radio traffic and the GPS evidence which pretty much sets the timeline.
As far as this particular theory of yours, we have to assume that the Lt's radio traffic was genuine. That he really did see three individuals at the old concrete plant and he really was going to investigate the three of them.
The time between the moment the Lt said to go ahead and send backup (7:55 am) and the time that backup officers reported their arrival (8:01) was only about 6 minutes. I understand that your theory was that this was a deliberate hit but it would also have to be a HUGE crime of opportunity because the attacker had only about 6 minutes to get the Lt's gun, shoot him twice in two different locations 100 feet apart and then either escape with the original three suspects or to inconspicuously blend in with the other arriving backups without raising any suspicious even in the days and now weeks after.
And how do we explain the fact that the Lt. did not use his radio to alert dispatch at any time between the two shots?
Indeed, what about the original three suspects and their part in this. Imagine one or more of them seeing one cop shoot another. Don't you think at least one of them would come forward with that information? Especially for the reward money?
I'm sorry but I just see too many holes in the time line for it to be a fit for me.