It says bridge in that article I linked up thread:
Allen, a 50-year-old resident of Delphi, went to the conservation officer right after the murders on Feb. 13, 2017, and said he was on the Monon High Bridge that afternoon but didn’t see the two girls, the source says.
Yeah, to me this is sounding more and more like KAK and Allen aren't connected, KAK was selling LE a made up story (perhaps in an attempt to get a plea deal on his other charges), and the timing was just a coincidence. Pretty wild if true. I guess a connection is still possible, but it doesn't seem likely to me if this article is accurate.
It does seem strange that he admitted he was on the bridge earlier on the day the girls disappeared, especially if he wasn’t investigated.
The article says that KAK told LE they’d find a cell phone and a weapon in the river. It further notes that evidence was not found and that KAK has a history of deceit with the police. So I’m still wondering how the hell they got the Search Warrant for RA’s house then? It doesn’t seem based on that article that they got information in support of a warrant via the actual search of the river -would it have been enough to get a Search Warrant based on whatever KAK told them even if they couldn’t prove what he told them with the physical evidence he said they’d find??
Right? This makes it far easier for a defence team to say it wasn’t my client, it was the guy you have in custody already. LE is going to have a hard time proving which guy it really was it seems. No wonder their investigation is on-going.
That's my question, because if KAK was feeding them crap, which he'd been known to do, wouldn't they ask for some kind of corroborating details before agreeing to an extensive search of a river?
It seems likely to me that LE has an idea of the weapon used (eg: a serrated blade vs a box cutter). He had to have said something significant for them to invest 5 weeks searching the river. Otherwise how do they justify the expense and man power? I wonder if he said it was in the river and they didn’t find it but they found probable cause on RA in the meantime and then got the warrant? Maybe they then found the weapon and charged him accordingly?
IMO, I dont think he was ever formally interviewed.
Yeah, I'm curious how many local-ish people tried to insert themselves early on. I can't imagine it would be that many but who knows.
The problem with blowing him off is he admits he was on the bridge the day the girls go missing even though he says he didn’t see the girls. The next day they are found - murdered. Anyone who was on the bridge that day, whether reported seen or self-confessed, should become a suspect.
Possible unfortunately but I don’t think likely and I don’t believe many locals interested in inserting themselves into the case. Hope we find out what happened.
