LammyTheRobot
Former Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2022
- Messages
- 264
- Reaction score
- 2,082
Nooo come on. Last week McLeland said to the judge, part of the rationale behind sealing the PCA was that there are others involved it could tip off. It clearly doesn’t do that….
There will be more to come. PCA are notorious for having just enough info to secure charges. Imo.Well, thin evidence. I can only hope there is more evidence than this. I'm not defending RA at all but man, really???? I further do not get AT ALL the purpose of wanting this kept sealed. It says very little except for the unspent bullet.
LE has confirmed they were found where they were killed; I do not believe that the "move" in the document meant they were relocated. But I could be wrong. I mean, I also would have thought that LE would have been able to find a killer who admitted shortly afterwards he was there that day and there was only 1 adult male on the trails at that time so... anything's possible at this point.According to the RL PCA, the bodies were "moved and staged."
I believe they have it. Wasn’t that the vehicle that was towed when they served the search warrant?Hopefully they can track down that 2016 Ford Focus. I don’t imagine it would be difficult as long as it’s not been totaled out since then. There would certainly be a lot of evidence in that vehicle.
I wonder if they asked her during her interview if he happened to do his own laundry that day, and was that usual, or unusual for him. My vote goes to it was a first for him.Since his wife said he "still owns a blue carhart jacket", I'm hoping they can pull the girls' DNA from it, surely it was covered in blood, too.
It was an unspent bullet, we don't know how they were killed. I do believe it was with a knife not the gun.There were others on the trails and bridge that day, yet I saw no mention of any of them saying they heard gunshots (or a car "backfiring" which can be mistaken for gunshots). You'd think someone would have said that and that it would have been included.
But the bullet had been racked through the gun. Why would it be in his pocket? Spare bullets in his pocket, sure, but this bullet had been through the gun. weird IMOit probably just fell out of his pocket where he presumably had his knife and/or zip ties or whatever.
Because you're smarter than he is? I'm really surprised by all of his admissions.I wonder if he racked the slide to scare the girls and the bullet kicked out and he just couldn't find it. Maybe he just assumed investigators never found it either.
I don't know why he didn't just lie? Why not say, "I've walked down their for years, and done some plinking from time to time, probably just a spent bullet from when I was here before."
With his head down being said a few times.Exactly. And witnesses saying he was walking with his hands in his pockets, avoiding talking to them, walking with purpose. He walked past other young girls, so it wasn’t an opportunity killing. He planned this, planned to target Abby and Libby specifically.. or actually just Libby given the crime scene
Do you (or anyone?) have a link to this PCA?According to the RL PCA, the bodies were "moved and staged."
We are missing a whole page, though.Yes you’re right but there’s nothing in the PCA about CSAM or anything related to photography/other media.
NoIt was confirmed he shot them?
I agree, I don't think they were moved other than within the small area where they were killed. Moved to stage, probably...jmo.LE has confirmed they were found where they were killed; I do not believe that the "move" in the document meant they were relocated. But I could be wrong. I mean, I also would have thought that LE would have been able to find a killer who admitted shortly afterwards he was there that day and there was only 1 adult male on the trails at that time so... anything's possible at this point.
Could the bullet being at the scene, which appears to belong to his gun be why they think others may be involved? Is it possible that in fact, he discharged that unspent bullet somewhere entirely other than at the crime scene, and someone picked it up and eventually placed it at the scene? It seems a lot of trouble to go through to frame a man for a murder he had no part in, and I cannot fathom who or why someone would bother really?? But is that going to be what the defense now argues??
Sorry to be so graphic but it's possible he used the unfired bullet as a prop for a photo, and in his haste to flee the scene, dropped it and never even thought about it until later. By then, there was no way he could go back and attempt to retrieve it.But the bullet had been racked through the gun. Why would it be in his pocket? Spare bullets in his pocket, sure, but this bullet had been through the gun. weird IMO
- they said they saw someone that looked and dressed like BG. RA said has those clothes along with 90% of midwestern males his age. descriptions very. easy to attack. I mean its not like they saw him in a unique costume we are talking about jeans and a carhart. This is as common as it gets in rural america.I would say that
- His identity being corroborated by no less than 4 witnesses
- Said identifiers corresponding with the video evidence we have
- The unspent round being found near them
- Said round belonging to his gun
- Him being seen with "muddy and bloody" clothing
- Him admitting to being at the scene
- His vehicle being spotted around
- The fact that "Guys, down the hill" was the ending of the video and we don't know anything that happened before that was captured, except for them spotting a gun.
- His initial statement saying that he didn't see anyone, changing to "3 females" this past October****
Makes for a pretty solid case that can only be stronger with what we don't know.
What the PCA does NOT show us:Ironically, I never really have thought he was in cahoots with anyone else, UNTIL I just read that PCA.
Why that day?
Why that bridge?
Why ignore all the other girls?
Why park his car like that?
Why arrive just before they did?
I still don't know if I believe he acted alone or with someone else, but now I can see why it's been alluded to.
jmo