One thing I was uncertain of is when it says Liggett has testified there is no DNA, electronic evidence etc linking RA to the crime scene, when was that testimony? Was it for the search or for the arrest warrant? Or more recently?
Defence seems to imply that this will also be the status at trial, based on discovery - but it wasn't particularly clear as the prosecution would not know that prior to applying for the search warrant
Defence seems to imply that this will also be the status at trial, based on discovery - but it wasn't particularly clear as the prosecution would not know that prior to applying for the search warrant