gregjrichards
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2010
- Messages
- 12,483
- Reaction score
- 70,525
I've been pondering why LE won't say whether the girls were sexually assaulted. LE always keeps some details secret in order to weed out false confessions, but something that general would normally not be kept secret.
-
The most logical explanation I can think of is that maybe one of the girls was sexually assaulted but one of them wasn't. That would be the sort of unique detail known only to the real culprit.
-
We know that Libby had a phone with her and that the perp didn't take it. If he didn't take it, maybe that's because he didn't find it. If he didn't find it, maybe that's because he didn't remove Libby's clothing, which would mean that she was not the one who was sexually assaulted.
-
My current theory, then, is that Abby was his target and was sexually assaulted, while Libby was collateral damage.
-
If that's the case, I would be inclined to take a much closer look at the other cases (mentioned by another poster) where a red-headed victim was raped and murdered, for Abby was a red-head, and red-heads make up only 2—6 % of the US population.
I don’t know what benefit it would be to law enforcement to publicly reveal whether a sexual assault took place it won’t help find BG and would cause the girls families distress. They are deliberately holding information back that only the killer would know until hopefully one day we get to charges being filed and a trial.