Found Deceased IN - Abigail (Abby) Williams, 13, & Liberty (Libby) German, 14, The Delphi Murders 13 Feb 2017 #107

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm still not sure on him being BG. He doesn't resemble the sketches, but I guess they haven't had any luck with them to begin with... I have my own theories but I guess Etter would make more sense. Idk, hopefully he comes out of this standoff alive so he can be questioned in regards to Abby and Libby. MOO
There are a million guys in Delphi that resemble BG..and now they throw out a second sketch ?? WTH??
 
Taken from thread 65 post 186 with acknowledgement to @Spellbound

Copy and paste up to 13 minute portion (parts 1 and 2 transcripts below of the Aug 2017 Holeman video interview recently posted.)

(Still looking for remaining part)


I (Spellbound) am working on transcribing the 27 minute interview between Alexis McAdams [A], reporter, and Sgt. Holeman [H]. I will put some time-marks throughout to help you find anything that may be a mistake by me, or to find a section. Alexis talks too fast and her wording is disjointed, so her questions may not be quite verbatim. And it is very much harder to do on an iPad than when I did real transcriptions for a job! (sorry, no time to proofread, please forgive -- when my fingers go numb every 5 minutes or so, there may be a lot of "funny" errors, but I tried to catch them.) I got through about half, but need a long break for making dinner and resting my fingers. Will try to get to the rest later tonight or tomorrow.

27-minute video interview 8/14/2017, Det. Holeman, near bottom of page, two possible sources (I used the second):
Lead detective in Delphi murders confirms police have more audio from phone, DNA evidence


https://player.ooyala.com/static/v4...5267225247&pcode=A5YjUyOju0deP9y9BK28b-61JYT5



PART 1
A: so tell me, obviously you guys see this posted all over online, people want to know , you have all this evidence in this case and still six months later no suspect in custody. What would your answer be to the community?

H: Well, it's not like on TV, you know you see on CSI shows that they solve them in two commercial breaks. So it takes a lot of time, and we want to be very thorough, so we want to take our time, make sure our i's are dotted, t's are crossed. This is a tough case. This is a tough case. There's, I think, alleged a lot of evidence, but really we have very little evidence in this case, so we're working with what we have. We're getting a ton of tips, which helps. But some of those tips are misleading and kind of lead us disarray and get us unfocused from where we're headed. So, but I think, it's not from lack of effort. We continue to use all the detectives from State, Federal, and Local agencies and we use all the resources that are available, and we are going to continue to do that. We're not gonna leave, we're, it's not a Cold Case, because we're still getting infomation. So we are gonna continue to work as hard as we can on this.

A: To have .... you say "little evidence", which you know we are not all .... I'm not a detective, I don't want to put the police ... but when you hear umm yeah the guy's voice, that sketch, you've got, you know, possible other audio and video and all these other tips and maybe then the reward money, is that more than people usually have in a case like this?

H: yeah, I think so. I think we, I said we don't have a lot, but we have more than, uhh, more than enough to make a case; but we're just not getting that break yet, you now. We're still getting closer every day; we're eliminating; we're getting a lot of on people that didn't do it and we eliminate those daily. So like I said before, it's the needle in the haystack and we get those tips on so-and-so and we eliminate them by however we do that, and that just takes some other pieces out of the hay so we can focus, and then eventually we're gonna, it's gonna be there. Umm, so we keep working but/and I think uh of people are misled by some of the FB postings, and social media is not as helpful as some people might think so ...

A: So six months ago you got the phone call, I know you talked about this before, who called you and said first Abby Williams and, you know, Libby German were missing?

H: [2:27] umm, I think I got the.... I heard it on the radio actually, and then I called the Sheriff to see if they needed assistance, and he said 'yeah, we probably are gonna need some help.' That was when they were missing; and then, of course, we got our helicopter involved and we were still on the search phase. And then, obviously, when we located them and knew it was a double homicide then we called in other resources throughout-- the State Police and then the FBI, and I know we have had just a ton of resources and people volunteering to help. Which is good. So that's how that started, you know, now we are here. We're still working, we're still motivated and a lot of people .... it is stressful. It's a very stressful case, obviously, and it's very easy to get emotionally tied, but I think everybody involved is still doing well. We're still motivated, we're still optimistic that we are gonna catch this person that's responsible for this, and we're not letting up or giving in or anything like that. We're stronger than ever. We're actually getting more people involved. So, I think, you know, the time is coming, we're getting closer everyday. I know that's cliche', but we are. We're eliminating people and we're working harder than ever.

A: And within the first 48 hours in the case, so here you are, you hear it on the radio, you step in which, thank God that you guys stepped in so quickly, because look how it ended up happening; whwen it first comes out two missing girls, you think two missing girls in a small town, who would have thought this was ever gonna be the case, but ... What was the investigative work that happened in the first 48 hours, without obviously going into too much detail to put the case in jeopardy?

H: Well, I think you secure the scene, you start doing whatever you can; talk to everybody in the area, we have the crime scene investigators there. Just basically the steps that you would do. Collecting videos throughout the areas, doing things like that. Just, you know, from Ground Zero. That's what you would do in any case, you know.... start talking to people, and get out knocking on doors. We call that an area canvass, so because it's a rural area we had to kind of stretch that out a little bit, and so we did maybe a general area canvass initially and maybe a day or two later we spread that out, come back, make sure. 'Cuz it was February so there was still people on vacation or winter "snowbirds" they call them, and so there were still some houses that we didn't make contact right away, so... But we have now, I mean we continue to do that and now six months later we're still getting new tips on people, so we're following up on those. But also, we have a group of detectives who are assigned to go back to make sure we didn't miss anything, so we re-review things and so we're taking it very serious and we're not gonna let anything slip through the cracks. That's your biggest fear, I think, when you're doing an investigation is something might slip through the cracks and we're not gonna let that happen. We have a team of people that keep going back, reviewing and we're getting there. We're working on it harder than ever and we're gonna continue to work hard.

[stopping at 5.32 for now]
[my fingers are totally numb, which means I constantly hit the wrong keys, so I have to take a break. Will continue as soon as I can]
=============================
PART 2:
A: [5.34] When the people come forward that mentioned, you know, because that sketch behind you is pretty detailed, like we said, and the guy that did it is obviously unbelievably talented because he maybe didn't have a bunch of information but it's unbelievable what they could come up with, right, and make it into this composite sketch that could end up helping crack the case. But, when did those people come forward that said that they saw him possibly near the trail?

H: Well, that's a good question. It's actually compiled, it's not just from one person, so we've had several people say that they saw the person that we identified through the video that we obtained off of Liberty's phone. And we put that out so once people saw that photo then they said "oh I saw that guy; I saw that guy." We have to determine 'is that the guy they saw' first of all, and if it is then let's work together. So, we were getting calls that night, and throughout the last couple months. Some people don't watch the news. Some people don't really follow what's going on . So some of them were sooner-than-later, um. But then we took our time with that. We took our time, we interviewed the composite drawing itself took probably 2/12 to 3 weeks, because we wanted to make sure ourselves that it was exactly right at the people had recalled that. So, um, we have been, I think, getting better tips. Obviously the first photo is pretty hard to see. It's pixelated pretty bad, and this is pretty detailed. We want to make sure that people know this might not look exactly like the person, but it's gonna have similar facial features. So, this is just what the person or persons that we've interviewed over the last several months believe this is what this guy looked like. There's four of us in this room right now. If somebody walked into this room for 30 seconds and left, we'd all have different drawings, but I think the facial features and the major identifiers we would all get right. So, that's what we're hoping, that this gives us a little more guidance, a little more not-as-vague. And it's helping. We are getting better tips. We're still getting some not-so-good tips, I would say. But we're getting a little better tips from this composite drawing.

A: [7.45]. is it a few people kind of , possibly that saw him, or there was more than a couple that called in, right?



H: Yeah. There's ... I would say that's a good statement, there's more than a few that said they saw him. Now, I guess we have to determine there was other people on that trail, or they actually seen that guy is responsible for this, or they seen somebody else that was just out there walking.

A: In time-frame-wise, how long do you think he was out there that day, and have you just kind of stopped by, tried to find if he was planning this, tried to find somebody that was walking off the trail and thought 'hey, this would be a good target", or was he just out there for a little bit?

H: I wish I could tell you that. I have theories, but we, you know, the evidence is pretty... like I said, the evidence doesn't really indicate how long or if he was a traveler or local, and some of that we just speculate on. We can't say he is or isn't. But we just have to go off that evidence that we have; the composite drawing, the video, the audio, and just continue to rely on the community. I still believe somebody knows, somebody knows what happened. For whatever reason, they won't come forward, and we wish they would, obviously.... because this person's probably gonna do this again and I'd hate for that to happen to you or your loved ones. That's the message that I want to get out to the public, that if you do know, for sure you need to let us know so we can possibly stop this from happening again to your daughter, or your mother, or sister, or anybody. Could be brother or father as well, so...
[numb finger break time]

A: [9.21] And personality traits in a person like this, and that's I think what people have thought about before and maybe him, if there was just one person, is this the guy that was able to get both of these little girls in the woods and do these, you know, brutally murder them, do you think he possibly has done this before?

H: Uh, he could be, you know, that's, again, just kind of our theory or speculation, we have no evidence that he's done it again. But we do keep that in mind. We do check with other states to see if they have anything close; and obviously the case in Iowa is the closest; but they don't even know the cause of death in that one because they didn't find the victims until later. So, it's hard to compare. But it is similar, but, so, we have taken that into consideration as well, and we have investigated that. We've been in contact with Iowa and they have been in contact with us, and we've discussed that, but nothing else seems to be popping up around the nation that is similar to this. But that doesn't mean he is gonna kill everybody the same way every time, so (shrugs), we don't know.

A: When you walked down and I walked through, that was private property right where the bodies were found. Looking at it logistically from where they were on the bridge and to where their bodies were found, I know we talked about the terrain in the past. I know it's not an easy thing to navigate. Usually you might have to be familiar with the area. I mean, would it have been difficult for the girls to from where they were on the bridge to where they were found?

H: [10:49] Yeah. Absolutely. I think it would be difficult, obviously. They have to go through some pretty steep terrain in a wooded area, sticker bushes and things like that, so it's uh ... and then to cross the creek. The creek, and obviously it's February, it's probably not the warmest . The weather was a warm day that day, but still the water temperature is probably cooler than the air temperature. So yeah, it would have been difficult for .... I mean, I don't think anybody, say on a walk, would walk that way.

A: Walking back that way, obviously I wasn't even there when you guys found all these horrible things at the crime scene. But even just walking through the area you get like a eerie feeling, almost feel sick to your stomach because you think about what Abby & Libby went through, and the families are going through, and the fact that he's still out there. You had to go to the crime scene, and like, I mean you covered, I'm sure, dozens of murder cases but this has probably been one of the hardest for you, having kids, as well. I mean, did you get a sick feeling as soon as you had to go there?

H: Oh yeah. I think everybody -- obviously when two young girls are brutally murdered and you are there to investigate it and see what you have to see and do what you have to do, you become emotionally tied to it and you think about your family and friends. But I think what keeps me going is I try ..... I've said this a million times.... you try to put yourself in these families' shoes and you just can't do it. I can't imagine what they are going through. So I try to put my emotions aside and focus on the evidence and focus on how can we bring justice for Abby & Libby, and for the families. I mean, is that gonna do it if we make an arrest? I think it will help; like anything can bring them back, obviously. I don't think anything can ever make things like they were before the 13th. It's never gonna happen. But we want to try and bring some closure to the families for the girls. And so, even though we are all trained professionals and we've done this many times, it's still hard, it's still hard to shut your brain off at night and go visit with your grandkids or visit with you family and not think about it constantly. So it's difficult, but you know, we are here for a reason. We're here to find out who did this, and that's what we have to keep telling ourselves and keep being re-motivated and motivated to do that. And that's what we're gonna do.

[13.13]
"I have theories, but we, you know, the evidence is pretty... like I said, the evidence doesn't really indicate how long [he was at the crime scene] or if he was a traveler or local, and some of that we just speculate on"

This statement 6 months after the murders has the ISP saying the initial evidence didn't pinpoint to them that the killer was local.

Two years later and close to 4 months after the Sheriff mentioned in the December 2018 Radar Online article that new evidence was sent to FBI for DNA testing research, the ISP holds the April 22 press conference saying boldly, the killer is local and hiding in plain sight.

FBI DNA testing research must be what led to that quite unusual April press conference that sounded more certain than speculative. I wonder what that new evidence was that the Sheriff talked about sending off to Quantico in December 2018? Did they take DNA (people's throw-aways or even their car touch DNA)from whomever in town that the previous 18 months had led them to believe were their best local suspect pool? Did the LE sent those numerous samples, their new evidence, to have the DNA tested and got a familial hit?
 
Taken from thread 65 post 186 with acknowledgement to @Spellbound

Copy and paste up to 13 minute portion (parts 1 and 2 transcripts below of the Aug 2017 Holeman video interview recently posted.)

(Still looking for remaining part)


I (Spellbound) am working on transcribing the 27 minute interview between Alexis McAdams [A], reporter, and Sgt. Holeman [H]. I will put some time-marks throughout to help you find anything that may be a mistake by me, or to find a section. Alexis talks too fast and her wording is disjointed, so her questions may not be quite verbatim. And it is very much harder to do on an iPad than when I did real transcriptions for a job! (sorry, no time to proofread, please forgive -- when my fingers go numb every 5 minutes or so, there may be a lot of "funny" errors, but I tried to catch them.) I got through about half, but need a long break for making dinner and resting my fingers. Will try to get to the rest later tonight or tomorrow.

27-minute video interview 8/14/2017, Det. Holeman, near bottom of page, two possible sources (I used the second):
Lead detective in Delphi murders confirms police have more audio from phone, DNA evidence


https://player.ooyala.com/static/v4...5267225247&pcode=A5YjUyOju0deP9y9BK28b-61JYT5

{SBM)

I just wanted to say - I had listened to it before. Even Sgt. Holeman's voice is not unlike that of the BG.

(Nothing against Delphi police, simply, the proof to the fact that how BG speaks is awfully generic).

If you start with 1:30 approx (Holeman), then listen to 1:34 «down the hill» and end with Holeman, you will see the similarity. The voices are of a medium-low timbre, and the vowels are slightly guttural (formed at the back of the mouth cavity). The cadence is typical for that area I assume. The BG has somewhat more colour in the voice, Holeman's one is more dull.

Who said «I heard it somewhere?», was it Lazenby? I think with the voice like this, you can hear it anywhere, any liquor store, any tobacco store, ER, bank, anywhere.
 
Last edited:
I’m curious, is it standard procedure to take DNA from deceased individuals (specifically in a situation like this where he was accused of kidnapping and rape) and put it into a database?

Speaking about the departed ancestors...

Don't throw out old envelopes. Soon My Heritage promises to offer lifting saliva from the stamps and isolating DNA from it. If you have some letters written by parents/grandparents, with envelopes, keep them!

(I plan to use it for genealogy, but it will be fed into the same Gedmatch...)
 
Last edited:
{SBM)

I just wanted to say - I had listened to it before. Even Sgt. Holeman's voice is not unlike that of the BG.

(Nothing against Delphi police, simply, the proof to the fact that how BG speaks is awfully generic).

If you start with 1:30 approx (Holeman), then listen to 1:34 «down the hill» and end with Holeman, you will see the similarity. The voices are of a medium-low timbre, and the vowels are slightly guttural (formed at the back of the mouth cavity). The cadence is typical for that area I assume. The BG has somewhat more colour in the voice, Holeman's one is more dull.

Who said «I heard it somewhere?», was it Lazenby? I think with the voice like this, you can hear it anywhere, any liquor store, any tobacco store, ER, bank, anywhere.
In that interview/transcript, Holeman actually says tips have been turned in on him.
 
Not really, but it is routine and legally required in the state of indiana when arrested for a felony offense.

Senate Bill 322 - DNA for felony arrestees

The grey area will be what if a suspect dies or kills himself prior to being arrested? That's going to be for the indiana courts to figure out, though.

I'm not prepared at this time to comment on how the court(s) in indiana would likely rule.

It won't be necessary in this instance, as his DNA would be in CODIS anyway for an old felony IMO.
 
Well, if his dna is in from an old felony, and LE has dna, it would seen that they logically would check CODIS first, and therefore he likely isn’t our guy. Moo

Is there an indication he has a felony post 2017 when that law went into affect in Indiana?

I saw a misdemeanor OWI in 2012, but no felony that would have spawned a DNA sample following that law going into affect.
 
Last edited:
Not really, but it is routine and legally required in the state of indiana when arrested for a felony offense.

http://iga.in.gov/legislative/2017/bills/senate/322#digest-heading

The grey area will be what if a suspect dies or kills himself prior to being arrested? That's going to be for the indiana courts to figure out, though.

I'm not prepared at this time to comment on how the court(s) in indiana would likely rule.
I would think if the victim was sexually assaulted, a rape kit was done and she identified her attacker as the deceased, LE would be within the law to take the deceased DNA. I could be wrong though.
 
Would/did they take DNA of all the searchers (volunteers, LE, EMT, etc) for elimination?
I know in the Rhoden case an ex-girlfriend/baby mom who was at one of the scenes that night was asked and gave her DNA willingly. She spoke about it in an article. So LE can ask anyone there to submit DNA but whether they do is their choice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
267
Guests online
307
Total visitors
574

Forum statistics

Threads
607,981
Messages
18,232,451
Members
234,264
Latest member
Inspectordreyfus
Back
Top