i’m referring to the suspect in custody not the killer per se we can’t know what we’re dealing with because that information has not been released
and in comparing Charles Luciano to this suspect is really comparing apples to oranges.
Child *advertiser censored* isn’t usually traded for money it’s usually traded between pedophiles for their own specific sexual interests
Because of the nature of it and the high likelihood of being apprehended commercially produced child *advertiser censored* isnt as prevalent or as lucrative as legal *advertiser censored* in the US, its usually produced by the offenders themselves and shared covertly in groups, mostly on line now.
And also stranger things have happened it’s not entirely out of the realm of possibility that the girls were either followed into the park by somebody or came across their killer by sheer chance, again we can’t know because law-enforcement has not released anything pertaining to the nature of their deaths
however the previous contact with up into the day of their death with a certain individual who agreed to meet them at the exact location where it occurred is an extremely strong coincidence and definitely needs to be fettered out completely
it is also possible that what we glean from the transcripts is also true, that they believe this individual may have been involved but not up to the point of murder in which someone else committed the actual murders , but he is aware.
Thank you. Interesting. So, digital pedophiles. I used to know real ones, and didn’t know them as such, but they worked according to a different principle - travel far away to places where rich tourists looking for kids were more or less commonplace, and whatever happened there, no one knew unless they themselves started boasting to other guys.
From the standpoint of what is happening to modern people, I have a question.
Let us take gamers as an example. At one point, there was a real community, D@D players, they’d get in person, form relationships.
Then, there were digital communities, around online games, with relationships that were often also online. Odd as it seemed to me, coming of a different generation, because in no way could I call these relationships partnerships, they exist. And they are communities.
Not to compare CSAM producers with any of other groups, but this digital aspect makes me wonder…can this be called a community? Does it have elements of a community? Or is it more of a “come who wants to be served?” principle?
You know why I ask. If whoever had access to A_S’s Dropbox was part of a “community” of pedophiles, then, one should look into that community to maybe find a potential SK masking as one. Because what drives a SK is very different. Or maybe, a pedophile person that Libby accidentally got across and turned to be a threat for him.
If this Dropbox was organized according to “you pay, you use” principle (and here I see analogy with an old bordello), then, it is not a community, just traffic. More an old-style “patrons” of a digital Dropbox. But still, there should be traces.