I hope you are right!
Supposedly KAK was trying to negotiate a deal back in December but he wanted all his child p*rn charges dropped for the information and the prosecuIt'vtion said “no”, and that was that.
A reporter guest on the “The Murder Sheet“ podcast a few weeks back said her sources told her KAK is the key.
My question to everybody is….what do you think a fair deal would be for KAK to get him to talk?
I think that’s a tough question. If he truly is the key to solving Delphi he is holding a handful of aces, drawing from a deck full of aces. He holds all the cards. Unless LE can find the connections and evidence by themselves, KAK is their only hope.
Is justice for the Delphi murders more important than justice for exploited children and the community?
My deal would be 1) tell us absolutely everything you know about the Delphi murders. Name names. This information must lead to an arrest and conviction. You must testify in court if necessary. 2) Your current charges will be satisfied on time served plus two years 3) you must register as a sex offender 4) you must report to a parole officer once a year for the rest of your life 5) if you are caught involved in child p*rn in anyway you will serve an additionAl 15 years in prison.
There is no fair here, in my opinion.
I’d love to hear what deals y’all would make.
I'm very curious about that MS podcast with the journalist. Surprisingly little has been discussed here about the things she said, which if true, were pretty straightforward about KAK being key AND another user communicating as a_shots. She also had this information for awhile
before any of the a_shots or KAK information was out to the public.
As far as a deal for KAK goes, my guess is it would probably depend drastically on what evidence LE has, who is their prime suspect, and whether or not the murders were directly connected to the CSAM investigation, etc. It would also matter how closely linked KAK is to the murders.
If I believe even some of what LE said in that 2020 KAK interview, along with what the journalist said, and put that together with the a_shots ask and other KAK related details (fb lying, Peru home searches, etc), then what I see is somebody with access to the a_shots account likely murdering L and A, then one week later, meeting up with the Galveston girl (ski mask incident), with who knows what intentions. If it is the same person, this could signal a serial situation, where more victims could still be yet unknown. Not only that, but if information about the murders was being shared, I think LE would want a handle on all of that before making any kind of announcement that could lead back to anyone specifically involved. They don't want the mice to scatter. And, maybe KAK's devices, some of which probably had data which took time to retrieve, were just the beginning.
I've said it before, but I wonder if the change in direction with the two sketches, the targeted PCs, the seemingly confusing wording, LE's lying about a SM connection, the FBI lying about the Ks involvement, the delay in asking about a_shots, and the relative silence is all due to the fact that they didn't want the CSAM information out there while they were waist-deep into the investigation. I don't think LE was turning a blind eye to KAK or any of his possible cohorts ever. I think the entire thing has been orchestrated to keep specific information quiet while they tried to fit all the pieces together, maybe for a multitude of crimes. And I think they are (or were) purposefully putting the pressure on KAK, deal or not.
I'm cautiously optimistic and appreciate they need a rock solid case to take to court. Hopefully we'll see that day.