I think LE knows who BG is. As some others have pointed out, it has been a while since public statements asking for identification of the man in the photos. Instead, all I've seen (and I have not seen everything) is more general, "keep the tips coming," kinds of statements. In addition, the disappearance of most billboard notices, etc. Whoever BG turns out being, identifying him is not enough to get a conviction for murder. LE has stated the voice recording may not be him, which means that a positive ID cannot be made with BG and the voice. Although the voice recording may have something disturbing on it, we are not privy to what that is, and it may not be enough to establish murder either. In my view, LE is searching for more evidence. They need to tie BG to something more. If nothing else is found on RL's property, car or home to implicate either him or someone else who was on his property, or in his car or home, then IMO the police will be back to square one. I do wonder if evidence was discovered in the bin across the road or in the vicinity of RL's car parked there. I am also apparently the only one interested in the movements of RL's car either around the time of the murders or in general. Was his car ever at or near the other areas that were searched? Did other people usually drive him around in his car? Was that permitted under his probation? Just my own interest because I've looked at the property and the photos so many times that I'm just trying to think of other things to consider. Was his car ever returned? Where is it now? MOO
