margarita25
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2012
- Messages
- 51,426
- Reaction score
- 207,177
I have no doubt this is Parabon. And I doubt there's even a new "she". Moo. Jmo. Moo.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Not blue"...without sounding like a broken record, I think this is some kind of genetic lab rule out via parabon, etc...it just sounds like computer talk to me. Again, could be wrong, but just not buying this new witness thing. Just a hunch, moo. Again IF they determined this via DNA, any ideas as to why specifically they wouldn't want the public or the perp to know they have DNA. Tia for your thoughts.
I have no doubt this is Parabon. And I doubt there's even a new "she". Moo. Jmo. Moo.
IMO DNA phenotyping is largely responsible for the sketch. A "witness" coming forward after 5 months makes no sense at all.
Turnaround time for a DNA phenotype sketch is 4-6 weeks. Most likely expedited in this case. That means LE has had this sketch for some time now.
The announcement of a "witness coming forward" is to protect LE from criticism for withholding sketch from the public.
Hey......whatever works to catch this guy!
Maybe they did get this description and sketch from RL, hence his "involvement" in the case. They said over and over he was not a suspect, maybe he has been working with LE all along. Maybe that is why RL was escorted to court by the sheriff. Who knows...
It's not out of the realm for RL seeing the perp because as we all know,in one interview he said"I just thought they got into the car like teenagers do".That being said,RL has blue eyes and the perp does not and per LE,RL is still involved but not a suspect.So it's entirely possible that he witnessed something or even the perp and was able to add to the description.They compiled this sketch from witnesses that saw this guy! <modsnip>
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
My posts are disappearing again so I hope it was saw that I read the part about the witness in the Rensselaer Republican newspaper and the Flora part from RTV6.
If this type of DNA test was used, they would know eye color among other things. Also, it does not produce a sketch but a computer derived "snap shot". The sketch is from eyewitness accounts.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We need links for these claims. If there aren't links, it's not verifiable information.
http://www.newsbug.info/monticello_...cle_32a392d6-6b62-11e7-876c-dfde3373c6a2.html
This is in response to a witness thats come forward, Leazenby said of the sketch. They sought us out recently.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ASjx7v-N_IYWe need links for these claims. If there aren't links, it's not verifiable information.
Thanks JaxCan't be much clearer that it was a new witness.
bbm and snipped
Can't be much clearer that it was a new witness.
bbm and snipped
http://youtube.com/watch?v=_n2f8pWAx-cWe need links for these claims. If there aren't links, it's not verifiable information.
Thanks Jax