Me too I thought he treated the girls memories and their loved ones with dignity and didnt try to sensationalise things the way other crime journalists do sometimes.
Hope you are well Rott Mom.
I am sorry for your loss. I totally agree with you. I do the same thing since losing my son. I could see the hurt and how they were trying hard to hold it together. You do what you have to do. I imagine after the taping of the show it was a different story. I so hope, for the sake of the families and for justice for the girls, the killer is caught no matter who or where he is.
drama farmer, your right on the money!
They were probably waiting for the man as I said before. A promise of seeing something or getting something? The girls were initially not afraid of him.
Could be, for sure.
Jumping on the personality traits of someone like isaiah keyes, who seemed to murder because he could, what do you think? I have always imagined this an opportunistic crime, happening fast, and the killer getting out in a hurry.
There *could* be an attention seeking quality. While there are no letters to the media or law enforcement, the events today would no doubt have either a fear response to the killer, or a feeling of positivity, depending on his personality.
Another take away from the Dr. Phil show, as suggested by Mike Patty, is the bridge guy is the guy in the blue jacket, and the voice recorded is BG as well, and BG is the killer.
Another thing I thought about was the window of time between the SnapChat pic of Abby, and Libbys dad calling to say he was almost to the parking lot to pick them up- a short window of time.
The killer mustve been quick and out of there before hearing the phone ring, the phone was dropped away from the final crime scene and couldnt be heard by the killer, or the killer ignored the ringing, unconcerned. If the latter, how odd.
bbm
I got the same impression, but would expand the definition of knew "them." Perhaps he has kids or interacts with kids like them on a daily basis, or he works with kids. Or, he's used to "directing" people. I know that's pretty broad and probably not all that helpful, but it's just a thought, a wild speculation on my part.
drama, this could be very true, he could have day to day interactions with children...bus driver, custodian ect. Whatever he is, he probably knew they would be there or as hard as it may be to except, they might of had a prearranged meeting. Maybe he promised to show them something "cool" but they couldn't tell their parents or other family members.
Hard call on that one. I think she was recording because of what they were supposed to be seeing or promised what would be there.
yep I think most of us knew that DG came to pick them up and made calls from when it was briefly allowed to be discussed. Now it has been stated in MSM it is fact.
I don't really understand them still asking for tips. They have stated they have hundreds of POI's that they cannot rule out so why do they need more? Are they hoping for more tips on those POI's they already have or do they believe they don't yet have the right person? They did say they couldn't talk about any POI's so I am wondering why. Does anyone have any thoughts on this? To me it's almost as if they are waiting for a specific tip on a specific person to be called in - like they suspect who did it but still need that tip to seal it.
Goodness this case. It brought me to WS and here we are 10 months later and I feel like we are so far away from an answer. This latest interview gave me pause though. Did it sound to anyone else like LE was suggesting that other people in DELPHI knew who the killer is or did I misunderstand? They kept saying people know who he is and I know that they could be referencing the nation and all the people in it as a whole but it almost seems they suspect others nearby know who it is, and aren’t sharing...I may have misunderstood.
Some of these details also make more certain for me that a SA most likely did not occur. The time-frame just seems so short and it would really explain the lack of SOLID DNA evidence. I bold solid because yes we know that there is DNA, no we still do not know if it’s the killers....this has never been made clear but the fact that they have multiple POIs that they can’t clear tells me that they do not have the DNA evidence they need...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Snap photo was at 2:07 and Dad was there at 3:14.
Many posts ago, someone walked and filmed the area and said how long it would take to get to where the bodies were found. Does anyone remember how long it took? That killer was acting fast and either still at the park when Dad arrived, or had already left the park. I'm thinking maybe he was still there.
Wonder if Dad stayed at the bridge, or wandered at all off the trail when he was looking? If he left the trails at what point? Wonder Dad heard Libby's phone ring? Maybe it was thrown in water at that point? Disabled as soon as the perp could get to it?
Don't mind me folks...just random thoughts popping in my head.
Hard call on that one. I think she was recording because of what they were supposed to be seeing or promised what would be there.