Thats how I see this going down more or less.
Chilling
Now reverse engineer this and what do we find?
What type of murderer does that?
How?
What would make him?
Did they intend to commit murder?
Was this person hanging around the trails looking for an opportunity?
Did they have an exit plan?
Okay, I’ll bite.
Reverse engineering, to me, is to examine the crime backwards from the suspect’s get away, backed up to his meeting the girls on the bridge, and backed up to where he was and what he was doing before he, himself, got on the bridge.
In the end, his pants would likely be wet. He would be trudging away, avoiding all contact with anyone. He may have found a spot to hide. He may have been cold. He got away.
Prior to that, he *may* have heard people calling for the girls. He may have decided to wrap things up.
He might have even felt fear for getting caught.
Prior to that, he led an all out horrible assault on two innocent girls.
Before that, he saw the girls. He was either under the bridge on the “down the hill” side, or tracked them from the drop off point.
Before that, I have my theories, as do you. If you have visited the scanner thread, you will find other evidence, and what might have happened before the final crime scene.
Who does this?
I do lean toward a sociopath, a child killer, and an opportunist. I have not ruled out he was hiding out in RL’s outbuildings a day or days before.
