Also, I wonder if the perp used either of their names? That would rule out a chance encounter and could support the idea of a scheduled meeting or at least that he knew they, Abby and Libby, would be there that day.
No, those pictures are consecutive (in reverse order, actually). You can see his left foot raised and then it plants on the board in front of him (same background all around). No removalof any head covering occurs.
Of course it is. I know it is far-fetched, but it could have been coordinated between LE and the packing plant to let LE come in under the guise of a bomb threat just to get inside and see if anyone working there acted strangely at the presence of law enforcement. It is admittedly far-fetched, but it was a thought I had.But calling in a bomb threat is against the law
It was also on NBC Nightly News last night. They even played the audio.
Right, but I think the tape began before he was actually close enough to talk to them. I believe they have every bit of the exchange recorded.I don't know.
Even if I was suspicious, when I was 13-14, if an adult said, "Hi, I'm Bob, what's your name?", I would say my name.
Is this case not being reported nationwide. It sounds like this is only just getting to some people. I just wondered why if this is the case. I would have thought it would have been on every news channel from the day they found the girls and released the pic.
It was on good morning America this morning
Of course it is. I know it is far-fetched, but it could have been coordinated between LE and the packing plant to let LE come in under the guise of a bomb threat just to get inside and see if anyone working there acted strangely at the presence of law enforcement. It is admittedly far-fetched, but it was a thought I had.
I from the UK so don't really know the big news channels. I just assumed that picture of the man would have been all over the country the day it was released and the way people were talking didn't sound like it was.
One thing about LE revisiting the area-
They have the video. They know that she began filming him on the bridge. I am guessing that he took control of them in some way on the bridge. With that known, they will be able to hear based on footsteps, when they went from walking on the cross-ties of the bridge, to walking in the leaves. They may also be able to hear if they stepped in water of if the ground changes to to sand. I am betting the video continued through the entire event. This would provide a lot of insight to them as to how fast they were moving through the woods. They can probably analyze the frequency of the footsteps to determine how fast they were walking and they know how tall Abby and Libby are. I really think that video can be used to get them very close to the actual path they walked. Knowing where and how fast they walked can give LE an idea of whether or not he had already chosen the place he was taking them or if he walked them randomly until he found a spot that felt suitable.
Also, I wonder if the perp used either of their names? That would rule out a chance encounter and could support the idea of a scheduled meeting or at least that he knew they, Abby and Libby, would be there that day.
Not ruling out an additional perp is the strangest part of this to me. They have loads of evidence for a crime of this nature. I feel they know for sure whether or not there is an additional person involved in the actual abduction and murders. I believe the phone continued recording after both girls were killed and it should be easy to tell if it is one or more people walking away.
BBM I'm confused as to why they aren't saying one way or another - we believe this individual acted alone or we have reason to believe he had an accomplice.
As soon as they went in, it was all over the news and assumed to be connected to the case. I was thinking that they wouldn't want to give the public and media a reason to suspect they had a suspect at the plant if they were just fishing a bit. It would also draw negative attention to the business.Why wouldn't they just walk in and walk around?
<modsnip>
Did anyone see anything? Hear anything that day? <modsnip>
<modsnip>
Did anyone see anything? Hear anything that day? <modsnip>
I'm only in this forum because I want to be part of the "popular crowd".............................other than that, I have nothing else to contribute.
Possibly there is concern whether a 2nd person was a juvenile, unwilling or unwittingly, at the scene of the crime. jmoo