Ha ha, I know! I've never been 100% convinced by the meter reader circumstances/story either, and the latest docs leave me that way. I always said from the beginning I was surprised LE didn't take the cadaver dogs over his work vehicle/work grounds, home, etc, now I think the same for all 3 (just as a part of routine investigation, to rule them out, I am not accusing them.) Agree with so many points made above. Plus the fact that people in this line of work have access to backyards, etc, know the greenway areas better than most people, etc. Add to that the bizarreness of him having called LE multiple times with the body still not being found. (I'm not saying that is his fault of course. I mean, how can someone explain the officer telling him he was wasting the county's time, etc?) Add to that the bizarreness that LE never searched there anyway much earlier (regardless if there was 2 or 3 or 4 feet of water in the depressed area, regardless if KMT had never suggested that vicinity, or if no meter reader had ever called.) Too much! Just one point, regarding him allegedly seeing the top of the skull, someone mentioned floating, I don't think a skull would float, would it, I think if the skull really was there and the story is true, he would have most likely been seeing the top of the skull where it was lodged/sitting which gives us some idea of the depth of water at that particular spot. Yeah, the whole thing of rattlesnake distracted them, subject of skull forgotten and not spoken of, rattlesnake taken and put in freezer, etc? What for? So they could show it later? Why would they think they'd need to? JMO
Originally the responding LE didn't want to go into the woods because of a diamondback snake they saw when investigating. Now, interviewing Kronk's co-workers, re: Aug. 11th, they also were interrupted by a snake:waitasec: which they caught & took with them?:waitasec::waitasec:
