I have to say this and other articles I've read are ridiculous. They equate marriage rights, abortion rights and other women's rights with cases like this one - as if Ireland needs to legally grant women the right not to be murdered in public in broad daylight.
No, as I see it the problem is that three hundred people supposedly out for blood form a mob around the courthouse once this perp is identified, and are even chomping at the bit to go after an innocent lookalike who was wrongly identified and yet not a single person helped Ashling when she actually needed it.
There's something wrong with that. I'm not sure exactly what it is, something about internet culture and people becoming adverse to confrontation until they have been assured by influencers (who have taken over the social role of peers) that they're the good guys - even when it should have been obvious that good guys would help a woman being attacked.
Probably the risk in intervening in a violent confrontation alone is too great compared to the relative reward when your hands would probably be too full to take any selfies while you do it to show your followers how heroic you are.
I'm not sure if you read the whole article or not, but I did not interpret it like that at all.
She's not equating all those issues with feminicide necessarily, but you have to understand that things like abortion restrictions, r*pe, assaults and killings all essentially could be boiled down to the same issue - a lack of consideration for women's free will and in some cases, straight-up hatred. It wasn't that long ago that Ireland had abortion laws that subjected women to what in my opinion is horrendous
medical violence - remember that this law changed in 2018.
As per the article, "Both movements were rooted in empathy, and centred the importance of listening to and respecting personal experience. [...] What these movements also did was place the weight of civic engagement on individuals and groups, making everyone take up the responsibility of participating in social change. [...] Now it feels that, on the issue of violence against women, a similar movement could blossom, based on the foundation of our social culture: ‘having the chats’."
What she is trying to say IMO is that there have been examples of social movements and cultural shifts in the recent past, and these could be built on and learnt from in order to address this issue.
As per your comment,
as if Ireland needs to legally grant women the right not to be murdered in public in broad daylight.
Well, it would honestly seem that way, and not only in Ireland. Someone may or may not be held accountable, but that doesn't help much when you're already dead or traumatised. And considering that in 2021 alone,
139 women died at the hands of men in the UK, punishment doesn't seem to be enough of a deterrent.
I agree that bloodthirsty mobs achieve nothing - and personally, in this case, I reckon half of those people were there because a foreigner dared to kill an Irish woman, but I digress - and is nothing more than virtue signalling. People want to feel like they're on the right side. How many of those people shouting in front of the courthouse would report their mate if they found out that he assaulted a woman? In my experience, many (even those who call themselves feminists) would fail to even cut ties with a mate after they found out that their buddy is a creep.
So yeah, we agree on that one. Personal accountability is very important too, and not just when a crime is actively being committed.
Hoping that someone will save the day is, in my opinion, missing the bigger picture. Garden variety abuse and violence happens behind closed doors all the time, with no one to see or stop it. We only know about Ashling because she ended up dead.
At the end of the day, we don't want heroes to save us, we just want these men to stop killing us in the first place.