denjet
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2009
- Messages
- 915
- Reaction score
- -40
Mason released a very strong statement saying this was a FRAUD and Strickland was going to be recused once again and this entire thing is ridiculous.
I am just happy that her DT has to do legal work for her again. It costs them money$
every time they say a word, file anything, research anything, even for them to to read anything. LOL And the lawsuits are coming down the pike as we speak.
Something I'm just not getting about probation, double jeopardy, recusing Strickland again is what part of the sentence for a crime you plead guilty to is up for debate ? appeal ? whatever you want to call it ... how can the defense argue now when when KC plead guilty to the charges and the defense never questioned the sentences ? ... Judge Strickland nor a jury found KC guilty ... she pleaded guilty ... I just don't understand where there's any wiggle room and why Mason (and others) would spout recusal and double jeopardy .. ???? :waitasec:
Another thing I don't understand are defense lawyers who fight each and every decision made against their client despite the fact that their client got off on the most serious felony charges ... like appealing the lying convictions ... seriously ? ... wouldn't most defense lawyers consider this a very successful outcome for them and move on ?