I have a question.
How can all these "experts", without seeing the evidence be of any use to the defense? Wouldn't you need to examine all the evidence to determine what you believe is indeed what happened? So, all these experts, to be fair, should be paid for their evaluation. How does the defense know that it is going to be favorable for them? What if one of these experts evaluates and says KC did it and here is my opinion. Obviously they wouldn't testify.
If JB has hired these experts to "find" evidence to help his client, won't the jury see that? Wouldn't you question the integrity of an expert if they are being paid by the defense, do PR for the defense and have not evaluated the evidence prior to interviews.
If this is the case....the so called experts aren't really experts, to me. They are hired help. They are being paid to provide a service (I would really like to call it what I think, but fear being placed in time out). There isn't any honor in that.
Also, many of these experts are authors, as well. Anything that any of these experts produce (outside the KC case) I will not support. I will not watch "Bones" anymore. I will not purchase any of their books. I will not watch their interviews.
I guess I am just confused. How can JB "guarantee" these experts that the evidence will support KC's innocence?
Respectfully,
BeagleMom