Mountain_Kat
Heca Firimar !
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2010
- Messages
- 13,966
- Reaction score
- 45,216
a---b (I win!) :floorlaugh:a------------------------b. Occam's Razor.
Not a>>
**$^&*
<<<*#
>>b.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
a---b (I win!) :floorlaugh:a------------------------b. Occam's Razor.
Not a>>
**$^&*
<<<*#
>>b.
Unless of course she wasn't blacked out drunk.
Put on HLN guys!
Okay. If anyone interprets the below official statement to mean that LE interviewed Jersey, cleared him, spoke with him and are moving on = LE interviewed Jersey, cleared him, spoke with him and are therefore "moving on back to Jersey", okay then. I agree to disagree and don't think it's worth further discussion; just very different interpretations. I take the statement below to mean that after interviewing, clearing, and speaking with Jersey, LE is moving on in other directions. JMO...
Official Statement:
Kansas City Police Department spokesman Steve Young said he could not discuss investigators interviews with Wright. However, Young did say the man known as "Jersey" has been interviewed and cleared of any involvement in the baby's disappearance. "We spoke to him and are moving on," Young said.
Is it the same stuff or something new?
I hope this post doesn't get me in trouble, because I intend no disrespect or offense to anyone.
For me personally, skepticism of the idea that Jersey is responsible for whatever happened to baby Lisa has nothing to do with what I think about her parents or other family members, or other people in the neighborhood. In fact, I don't know what happened to her, or with anyone else the night she disappeared. I don't know if it's because of my inexperience with following cases so closely or what, but it seems like I can find something to doubt or question in each theory I've read here, no matter how reasonable I think that theory may be. :twocents:
Please read the facts as reported by the HRD expert - I've quoted them repeatedly in this thread and linked to the HRD thread (as has indamiddle): it's a good indication that EITHER a dead body was here OR something that came into contact with a dead body was here.
Thank you, but I have read the facts, and I believe it's a stretch to theorize that this cadaver dog did not hit on a dead body, when a child is missing. It's OK if you don't agree with me... we're all adults here... :chillout:
It doesn't necessarily have to be the woods. It could have also been somewhere in the townhouses or any house or building along the way if it happened.I wonder what that person did in the woods for 2 hours... from the time of the first witness sighting at 12:15 to the video at the convenience store at 2:30, other than start a fire. That seems to all be within a few blocks.
So Jersey (and/or Megan) kidnapped Lisa, killed her, and then crept back through the window and touched Debbie's stuff? :waitasec:
Yikes, this guy really IS scary.
It doesn't necessarily have to be the woods. It could have also been somewhere in the townhouses or any house or building along the way if it happened.
Unless of course she wasn't blacked out drunk.
Regardless of the different opinions on this, the bottom line is that there is a baby missing, and a HRD hit on something in the house. And, in addition to that, we don't know if there wasn't a dozen more dogs paraded through that house and they all hit. One hit, to me, is enough, considering there is a baby missing. But, that's just me.
I was just thinking that when I read your post. What if one of the boys put the kitten in her crib and the kitten "took her breath away"...old wive's tale, but it has happened. The kitten smothered her...then the kitten would be the transfer to DB's bedroom. ?
I think we can safely assume a federal case exists because the FBI is very much involved. And on the same note, because KCPD has cleared somebody doesn't necessarily mean the FBI has. It all could be a case of semantics. The FBI has made absolutely no statements to my knowledge.
It's been reported by the KC Star in the timeline that night (linked above) that Brando (neighbor) was with her when DB was drunk and DB went to bed.
Therefore, according to the Star, Brando can corroborate DB's story about her level of intoxication.