Actually, if the defendant is willing to plead out, IMO he/she should have that right and not be encouraged by legal counsel to take the case to trial. If the client desires to plead guilty, and the attorney thinks they should make the state prove the case, that is a preference not necessarily what is "best" for the client. You'll note that I mentioned that I "get" the legal system.
I was responding to Spicer2000 who indicated it would a great case for Camblos because of the national exposure and the circumstantial nature of the evidence revealed thus far. IMO, taking a case for free publicity and name recognition is not part of the greater good either.
As to your repetition of the phrase "freedom isn't free," I agree. But, sitting through years of delays, trials, presentations of the gruesome details of a child's death might also be called "cruel and unusual punishment."
I really do understand the need for a vigorous strong defense, if one's client wishes to fight the charges. But, I am also keenly aware that trials are seldom speedy anymore and justice is not swift. The pain of losing a child is forever, however.