panthera
Retired WS Staff
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2006
- Messages
- 26,408
- Reaction score
- 86
Somebody mentioned upthread that she already set the stage for herself by saying that her backpack was in the bathroom. So I guess she is going to say that it just happened to be right there in her backpack when she needed it to 'defend' herself.
Let us go with that for a moment. She's taking photos of him in the shower. She drops the camera. He's enraged and lunges at her. He could overpower her before she even had a chance to get the gun out of the backpack. The knife is supposedly in the bathroom. Wouldn't it be more convenient for her to pick up the knife, which is visible rather than rummage through a backpack for a gun.....even IF she could do all this without getting into a physical altercation with him? Yet she has no injuries other than cuts from what is perceived to be the knife slipping as it became wet with blood from stabbing him.
My point is, no matter what spin she tries to put on it, nothing makes sense as to her defending herself and in imminent fear of her life to justify shooting him, stabbing him multiple times, slitting his throat and dragging him back to the shower. The mere fact he ends up back in the shower stall indicates an attempt to cover up the crime. Then add the laundry and the camera in the washer. The weapons are also missing......all from "self-defense"? I doubt she will have an explanation.
MOO